Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AROW vs CHMG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AROW
Arrow Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$613M
5Y Perf.+42.9%
CHMG
Chemung Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$327M
5Y Perf.+168.6%

AROW vs CHMG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AROW logoAROW
CHMG logoCHMG
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$613M$327M
Revenue (TTM)$243M$140M
Net Income (TTM)$44M$15M
Gross Margin65.3%64.2%
Operating Margin22.8%14.2%
Forward P/E10.0x9.5x
Total Debt$29M$5M
Cash & Equiv.$29M$23M

AROW vs CHMGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AROW
CHMG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Arrow Financial Cor… (AROW)100142.9+42.9%
Chemung Financial C… (CHMG)100268.6+168.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AROW vs CHMG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AROW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chemung Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AROW
Arrow Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

AROW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 3.1%
  • Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 49.7%
  • 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CHMG
Chemung Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 194.7% 10Y total return vs AROW's 110.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAROW logoAROW8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
ValueCHMG logoCHMGLower P/E (9.5x vs 10.0x)
Quality / MarginsAROW logoAROWEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCHMG logoCHMGBeta 0.72 vs AROW's 0.75, lower leverage
DividendsAROW logoAROW3.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)CHMG logoCHMG+49.2% vs AROW's +45.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AROW logoAROWEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5%

AROW vs CHMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AROWArrow Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
51.9%$11M
Fiduciary and Trust
48.1%$10M
CHMGChemung Financial Corporation
FY 2025
W M G Fee Income
47.4%$12M
Interchange Revenue
17.1%$4M
Product and Service, Other
11.7%$3M
Overdraft Fees
11.4%$3M
Service Charge on Deposits, Other
6.2%$2M
Investment Brokerage
4.7%$1M
Sale of Loans
1.0%$261,000
Other (1)
0.6%$149,000

AROW vs CHMG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAROWLAGGINGCHMG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

AROW is the larger business by revenue, generating $243M annually — 1.7x CHMG's $140M. AROW is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$243M$140M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$60M$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$44M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$36M$47M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.3%+64.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.8%+14.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.1%+10.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.9%+1.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+29.8%
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AROW and CHMG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, AROW trades at a 35% valuation discount to CHMG's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AROW's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 15.5x.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
Market CapShares × price$613M$327M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$613M$309M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.02x21.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.04x9.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.31x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.08x15.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.53x2.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.42x1.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.95x161.49x
Evenly matched — AROW and CHMG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AROW delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AROW's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AROW scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.6%+6.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.3%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.6%+5.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$62,000-$18M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$23M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29M$5M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.72x0.44x
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CHMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $16,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,319 for AROW. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +49.2% total return vs AROW's +45.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AROW at 27.6% vs CHMG's 27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.6%+25.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.9%+49.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+107.9%+105.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.2%+69.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.9%+194.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.6%+27.2%
CHMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AROW and CHMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CHMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AROW's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.75x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.09$70.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.57$43.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+96.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.171.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded90K11K
Evenly matched — AROW and CHMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AROW as "Hold" and CHMG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -19.2% upside for AROW (target: $30) vs -26.5% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, AROW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.08% vs CHMG's 1.93%.

MetricAROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…CHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$50.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts17
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.14$1.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%0.0%
AROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallArrow Financial Corporation (AROW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AROW vs CHMG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AROW or CHMG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the stronger pick with 8.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AROW or CHMG?

On trailing P/E, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AROW or CHMG?

Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +69.

3%, compared to +23. 2% for Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +194. 7% versus AROW's +110. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AROW or CHMG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Arrow Financial Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning AROW is approximately 5% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 7% for Arrow Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AROW or CHMG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is pulling ahead at 8.

7% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrow Financial Corporation grew EPS 49. 7% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AROW or CHMG?

Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

1% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROW leads at 22. 8% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROW leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AROW or CHMG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.

5x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Arrow Financial Corporation — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AROW: -19. 2% to $30. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AROW or CHMG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).

09

Is AROW or CHMG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 1. 9% yield, +194. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +194. 7%, AROW: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AROW and CHMG?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AROW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AROW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHMG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AROW and CHMG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AROW: 8.7% · CHMG: -6.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(AROW: 18.1% · CHMG: 10.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AROW: 14.0x · CHMG: 21.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.