Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $106M | $1.81B | $1.60B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $56M | $674M | $4.25B | $415M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-9M | $-173M | $-1.43B | $271M |
| Gross Margin | 90.2% | 67.5% | 75.2% | 35.1% | 78.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | -12.2% | -27.2% | -26.4% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 90.8x | 71.9x | — | 5.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $26M | $290M | $37M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $20M | $103M | $532M | $551M |
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 145.9 | +45.9% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 33.4 | -66.6% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 134.7 | +34.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- +52.0% vs PRGO's -49.3%
DERM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 2.76x
- Better valuation composite
- 9.9% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 96.4% 10Y total return vs ARQT's 7.4%
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 65.4% margin vs PRGO's -33.5%
- Beta 0.13 vs NVCR's 2.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.4% margin vs PRGO's -33.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs PRGO's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs PRGO's -16.7%, ROIC 16.8% vs -17.1% |
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
INVA leads 2 • ARQT leads 0 • DERM leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ARQT and INVA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 75.4x DERM's $56M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -33.5%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +81.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $56M | $674M | $4.3B | $415M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$3M | -$165M | -$1.1B | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$9M | -$173M | -$1.4B | $271M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$3M | -$48M | $145M | $195M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.2% | +67.5% | +75.2% | +35.1% | +78.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -12.2% | -27.2% | -26.4% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -15.5% | -25.7% | -33.5% | +65.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -4.8% | -7.1% | +3.4% | +46.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.5% | +1.0% | +12.3% | -2.5% | +28.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +5.9% | -100.0% | -31.0% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $106M | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $111M | $2.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -180.15x | -7.19x | -13.02x | -1.13x | 6.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 90.83x | 71.86x | — | 5.82x | 11.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 5.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.68x | 1.89x | 2.76x | 0.38x | 3.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.73x | 5.27x | 5.20x | 0.55x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.04x | 8.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. PRGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DERM's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVCR scores 5/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | -45.4% | -50.8% | -48.6% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | -10.8% | -16.5% | -16.7% | +16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | -56.8% | -16.4% | -17.1% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | -34.2% | -28.9% | -13.9% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.28x | 0.85x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $5M | $187M | -$495M | -$551M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $20M | $103M | $532M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $26M | $290M | $37M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.44x | -1.52x | -96.80x | -6.91x | 11.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DERM and INVA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $787 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ARQT leads with a +52.0% total return vs PRGO's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 49.5% vs NVCR's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.2% | -30.5% | +21.0% | -14.1% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.0% | -24.6% | -10.6% | -49.3% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +234.2% | -76.7% | -58.0% | +92.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | -45.5% | -92.1% | -59.4% | +96.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | -45.5% | +40.0% | -78.5% | +96.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +49.5% | -38.5% | -25.1% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 40.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.82x | 2.20x | 1.18x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.77 | $9.55 | $20.06 | $28.44 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.42 | $4.31 | $9.82 | $9.23 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +54.2% | +79.2% | +40.9% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 41.7 | 76.7 | 50.2 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 225K | 1.6M | 3.3M | 620K |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARQT as "Buy", DERM as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 126.8% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 51.6% for ARQT (target: $36). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.50 | $11.75 | $33.50 | $20.00 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 3 | 15 | 36 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). INVA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
ARQT vs DERM vs NVCR vs PRGO vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +96. 3%, compared to -92. 1% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +90. 5% versus PRGO's -76. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 1648% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 128% for Journey Medical Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -26. 4% for PRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
8x forward P/E versus 90. 8x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 85. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 126. 8% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ARQT, DERM, NVCR, INVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARQT or DERM or NVCR or PRGO or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +90. 5%, NVCR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARQT and DERM and NVCR and PRGO and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRGO pays a dividend while ARQT, DERM, NVCR, INVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.