Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARRY vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
ARRY vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $4.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $766M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $244M | $474M |
ARRY vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARRY vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARRY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7%
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 17.8x)
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.70
- 17.6% 10Y total return vs ARRY's -77.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.7% vs ENPH's -18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC 6.8% vs 9.0% |
ARRY vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARRY vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH and ARRY operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.2B in trailing revenue. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, ENPH holds the edge at -20.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.1% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENPH's 22.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.13x | 27.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.64x | 17.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.41x | 22.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.76x | 4.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.58x | 49.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. ENPH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs ARRY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.6% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.94x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $522M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $244M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $766M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.42x | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARRY five years ago would be worth $3,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,936 for ENPH. Over the past 12 months, ARRY leads with a +57.7% total return vs ENPH's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARRY at -24.2% vs ENPH's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.1% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.7% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | -78.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.0% | -70.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | +1764.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.2% | -39.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARRY and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.23 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.92 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.4% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARRY as "Buy" and ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for ENPH (target: $43) vs 12.9% for ARRY (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.17 | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% |
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ARRY vs ENPH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARRY or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARRY or ENPH?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARRY or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) delivered a total return of -68. 0%, compared to -70. 6% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1765% versus ARRY's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARRY or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 37% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARRY or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enphase Energy, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to 62. 6% for Array Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARRY leads at -7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARRY or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus 6. 6% for ARRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARRY or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for Enphase Energy, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 21. 5% to $43. 48.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARRY or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ARRY or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1765% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1765%, ARRY: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARRY and ENPH?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.