Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-79.9%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+116.4%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-76.9%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-67.7%

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARRY logoARRY
FSLR logoFSLR
SHLS logoSHLS
CSIQ logoCSIQ
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$1.25B$23.06B$1.32B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$1.21B$5.42B$536M$5.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-67M$1.67B$34M$-104M
Gross Margin22.4%41.7%33.5%18.3%
Operating Margin4.5%33.0%11.2%0.1%
Forward P/E11.7x12.0x19.4x
Total Debt$766M$499M$175M$7.68B
Cash & Equiv.$244M$2.80B$7M$1.91B

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARRY
FSLR
SHLS
CSIQ
StockJan 21May 26Return
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10020.1-79.9%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100216.4+116.4%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10023.1-76.9%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)10032.3-67.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Array Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CSIQ also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs CSIQ's 14.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
  • 30.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
Best for: income & stability
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +97.1% vs ARRY's +62.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARRY logoARRY40.2% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
ValueARRY logoARRYBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs ARRY's +62.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs 9.0%

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGARRY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 10.4x SHLS's $536M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$5.4B$536M$5.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$95M$2.2B$73M$284M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$67M$1.7B$34M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$58M$1.7B-$77M-$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.4%+41.7%+33.5%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.5%+33.0%+11.2%+0.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.6%+30.7%+6.3%-1.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.8%+30.8%-14.5%-29.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.1%+23.6%+74.9%-20.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.0%+65.1%-3.7%
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CSIQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$23.1B$1.3B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$20.8B$1.5B$7.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-11.23x15.10x39.20x-11.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.75x12.04x19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.50x9.38x22.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.98x4.42x2.77x0.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.80x2.42x2.20x0.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.72x19.42x
CSIQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.6%+18.0%+5.7%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.4%+12.6%+3.7%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+17.6%+5.9%-0.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.2%+15.9%+7.6%-0.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95751
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.94x0.05x0.29x1.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$522M-$2.3B$168M$5.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$244M$2.8B$7M$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$766M$499M$175M$7.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.42x53.51x5.91x0.02x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,724 for SHLS. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs ARRY's +62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SHLS's -26.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.3%-21.8%-13.8%-30.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+62.7%+65.3%+66.5%+97.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.1%+20.9%-60.2%-52.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.7%+187.6%-72.8%-55.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.5%+324.1%-74.7%+14.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.0%+6.5%-26.5%-21.9%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs CSIQ's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.32x1.39x2.08x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.23$285.99$11.36$34.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.92$125.80$3.81$8.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.0%+75.0%+69.0%+51.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.464.363.262.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.0M2.1M5.1M2.5M
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ARRY as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for CSIQ (target: $29) vs 11.8% for ARRY (target: $9).

MetricARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.17$264.13$9.83$28.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts28732333
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.0%+5.9%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CSIQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARRY vs FSLR vs SHLS vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -72. 8% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 67% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -387. 0% for Canadian Solar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -0. 5% for CSIQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSLR leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 63. 3% to $28. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ARRY or FSLR or SHLS or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARRY and FSLR and SHLS and CSIQ?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARRY and FSLR and SHLS and CSIQ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARRY: -26.1% · FSLR: 23.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.