Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $13M | $514M | $4.05B | $4.57B | $22.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $163M | $2.64B | $2.20B | $16.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $42M | $214M | $269M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 48.4% | 26.3% | 23.4% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 30.2% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 16.4% |
| Forward P/E | 41.9x | 11.5x | 19.4x | 20.3x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3M | $131M | $45M | $2.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $8M | $610M | $356M | $2.01B |
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art's-Way Manufactu… (ARTW) | 100 | 130.9 | +30.9% |
| Legacy Housing Corp… (LEGH) | 100 | 178.9 | +78.9% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 293.2 | +193.2% |
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 254.8 | +154.8% |
| PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) | 100 | 346.0 | +246.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARTW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +42.5% vs SKY's -16.3%
LEGH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 3.51x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 3.51x
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.7x)
SKY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs PHM's 5.7%
- PEG 0.71 vs LEGH's 5.52
- 22.7% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1%
CVCO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.2% ROA vs LEGH's 7.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.1%
PHM is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.8% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs SKY's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CVCO's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.5% vs SKY's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs LEGH's 7.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.1% |
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PHM leads in 3 of 6 categories
LEGH leads 1 • CVCO leads 1 • ARTW leads 0 • SKY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PHM is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.8B annually — 698.8x ARTW's $24M. LEGH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKY's 8.1%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $163M | $2.6B | $2.2B | $16.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $51M | $306M | $221M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $42M | $214M | $269M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $596,642 | $30M | $260M | $205M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +48.4% | +26.3% | +23.4% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +30.2% | +9.8% | +9.8% | +16.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +26.0% | +8.1% | +12.2% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +18.3% | +9.9% | +9.3% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -3.7% | +1.8% | +11.3% | -12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.2% | -3.0% | -19.1% | -30.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PHM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, PHM trades at a 75% valuation discount to ARTW's 41.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHM offers better value at 0.64x vs LEGH's 5.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $514M | $4.1B | $4.6B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $508M | $3.6B | $4.3B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.94x | 12.40x | 21.43x | 23.29x | 10.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.47x | 19.44x | 20.34x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.97x | 0.78x | 1.13x | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.31x | 10.10x | 12.69x | 20.32x | 7.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 3.12x | 1.63x | 2.27x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.98x | 2.76x | 3.74x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.94x | 18.25x | 21.29x | 29.09x | 12.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $8 for LEGH. LEGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARTW's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARTW scores 7/9 vs LEGH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | +8.1% | +13.4% | +24.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +7.4% | +10.1% | +18.2% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.1% | +16.9% | +19.4% | +17.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +9.4% | +14.8% | +17.4% | +20.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.00x | 0.08x | 0.04x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$6M | -$479M | -$311M | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,860 | $8M | $610M | $356M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3M | $131M | $45M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.55x | 1926.55x | 51.32x | 211.73x | 5590.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PHM leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,846 for ARTW. Over the past 12 months, ARTW leads with a +42.5% total return vs SKY's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PHM at 20.8% vs LEGH's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +11.8% | -13.7% | -18.5% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.5% | -13.4% | -16.3% | -7.0% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -5.4% | -2.6% | +57.7% | +76.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.5% | +9.5% | +64.0% | +123.5% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | +79.3% | +714.5% | +448.0% | +571.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | -1.8% | -0.9% | +16.4% | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGH and PHM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHM currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs ARTW's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.84x | 0.96x | 1.24x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.71 | $29.45 | $99.17 | $713.01 | $144.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.69 | $18.34 | $59.44 | $393.53 | $95.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +73.2% | +73.9% | +67.6% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 53.9 | 46.0 | 46.2 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 105K | 500K | 142K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
PHM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEGH as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy", PHM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). PHM is the only dividend payer here at 0.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | $106.00 | $475.00 | $141.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 8 | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.5% | +2.0% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
PHM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). LEGH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ARTW vs LEGH vs SKY vs CVCO vs PHM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
On trailing P/E, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, Legacy Housing Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Champion Homes, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus Legacy Housing Corporation's 5. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to -21. 5% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +714. 5% versus ARTW's -18. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning CVCO is approximately 47% more volatile than LEGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 40% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Legacy Housing Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
4% net margin versus 1. 3% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEGH leads at 29. 4% versus 1. 9% for ARTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGH leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus Legacy Housing Corporation's 5. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM?
In this comparison, PHM (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ARTW, LEGH, SKY, CVCO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARTW or LEGH or SKY or CVCO or PHM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 0. 8% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHM: +574. 9%, ARTW: -18. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARTW and LEGH and SKY and CVCO and PHM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARTW (Industrials) and LEGH (Consumer Cyclical) and SKY (Consumer Cyclical) and CVCO (Consumer Cyclical) and PHM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARTW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PHM is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PHM pays a dividend while ARTW, LEGH, SKY, CVCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.