AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
Leisure
Market Cap$20.24B
5Y Perf.+123.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AS vs RL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$47.87B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
AS vs RL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AS | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $20.24B | $47.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.10B | $7.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $311M | $919M |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | 30.5x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.48B | $2.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $345M | $1.92B |
AS vs RL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AS
RL
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) | 100 | 223.6 | +123.6% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AS vs RL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RL leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amer Sports, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
The Growth Play
AS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 132.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 17.8% revenue growth vs RL's 6.7%
Best for: growth exposure
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Income Pick
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 0.9%
- 319.2% 10Y total return vs AS's 172.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AS | 17.8% revenue growth vs RL's 6.7% |
| Value | RL | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 30.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | RL | 11.7% margin vs AS's 5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | RL | Beta 1.50 vs AS's 1.96 |
| Dividends | RL | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RL | +48.6% vs AS's +36.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RL | 11.8% ROA vs AS's 3.2%, ROIC 20.6% vs 5.8% |
AS vs RL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2020
AS vs RL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRLLAGGINGAS
ASAmer Sports, Inc.
0leads
RLRalph Lauren Corporat…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ASMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RL4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RL6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RL5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
RL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL and AS operate at a comparable scale, with $7.8B and $6.1B in trailing revenue. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AS's 5.1%. On growth, AS holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $766M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $311M | $919M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $270M | $695M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.3% | +24.7% |
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AS and RL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.5x trailing earnings, RL trades at a 88% valuation discount to AS's 260.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AS's 28.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RL's 42.2x.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.2B | $47.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.4B | $48.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 260.64x | 30.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.47x | 21.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.71x | 42.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.90x | 6.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 110.58x | 46.98x |
Evenly matched — AS and RL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $5 for AS. AS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RL's 1.03x.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +20.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $746M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $345M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.27x | 23.25x |
RL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AS five years ago would be worth $27,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,443 for RL. Over the past 12 months, RL leads with a +48.6% total return vs AS's +36.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.2% vs AS's 39.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.3% | +225.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.3% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.3% | +319.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.6% | +48.2% |
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RL is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AS's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RL currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs AS's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.64 | $393.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.74 | $237.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.8 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 532K |
RL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AS as "Buy" and RL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.8% upside for AS (target: $49) vs 21.3% for RL (target: $429). RL is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.83 | $428.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
RL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallRalph Lauren Corporation (RL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AS vs RL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AS or RL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AS or RL?
On trailing P/E, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the cheapest at 30.
5x versus Amer Sports, Inc. at 260. 6x. On forward P/E, Ralph Lauren Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AS or RL?
Over the past 5 years, Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) delivered a total return of +172. 3%, compared to +164. 4% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +319. 2% versus AS's +172. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AS or RL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
50β versus Amer Sports, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AS is approximately 30% more volatile than RL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 103% for Ralph Lauren Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AS or RL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 6. 7% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amer Sports, Inc. grew EPS 132. 6% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for Ralph Lauren Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AS leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AS or RL?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 1. 4% for Amer Sports, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 9. 1% for AS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AS or RL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) trades at 21.
7x forward P/E versus 30. 5x for Amer Sports, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AS: 33. 8% to $48. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — AS or RL?
In this comparison, RL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AS or RL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +319. 2% 10Y return). Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +319. 2%, AS: +172. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AS and RL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RL pays a dividend while AS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AS: 29.7% · RL: 12.2%)Net Margin>
%
(AS: 5.1% · RL: 11.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AS: 260.6x · RL: 30.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.