AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
Leisure
Market Cap$20.62B
5Y Perf.+127.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AS vs UAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.31B
5Y Perf.-27.8%
AS vs UAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AS | UAA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $20.62B | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.10B | $4.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $311M | $-520M |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 31.1x | 55.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.48B | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $345M | $501M |
AS vs UAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AS
UAA
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) | 100 | 227.9 | +127.9% |
| Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AS vs UAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Under Armour, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
The Growth Play
AS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 132.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 177.5% 10Y total return vs UAA's -83.3%
- 17.8% revenue growth vs UAA's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
The Income Pick
UAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.36
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 68.7%, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 2.10x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AS | 17.8% revenue growth vs UAA's -9.4% |
| Value | AS | Lower P/E (31.1x vs 55.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | AS | 5.1% margin vs UAA's -10.4% |
| Stability / Safety | UAA | Beta 1.36 vs AS's 1.96 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AS | +45.4% vs UAA's +13.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AS | 3.2% ROA vs UAA's -11.2%, ROIC 5.8% vs -5.1% |
AS vs UAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
AS vs UAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASLAGGINGUAA
UAAUnder Armour, Inc.
1leads
ASAmer Sports, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs UAAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AS5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
UAA3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AS7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AS and UAA operate at a comparable scale, with $6.1B and $5.0B in trailing revenue. AS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UAA's -10.4%. On growth, AS holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $766M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $311M | -$520M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $270M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | -10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | -5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.3% | — |
AS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
UAA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.8B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 265.64x | -13.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.05x | 55.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.23x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.98x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.73x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 112.70x | — |
UAA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AS delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-36 for UAA. AS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAA's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AS scores 8/9 vs UAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | -36.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | -5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $798M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $345M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.27x | -5.74x |
AS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AS five years ago would be worth $27,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,617 for UAA. Over the past 12 months, AS leads with a +45.4% total return vs UAA's +13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AS at 40.5% vs UAA's -9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.4% | +13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.5% | -25.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.5% | -73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.5% | -83.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.5% | -9.3% |
AS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AS and UAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UAA is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AS's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs UAA's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.64 | $8.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.33 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +79.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 8.1M |
Evenly matched — AS and UAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AS as "Buy" and UAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.3% upside for AS (target: $49) vs 14.9% for UAA (target: $7).
| Metric | ASAmer Sports, Inc. | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.83 | $7.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmer Sports, Inc. (AS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AS vs UAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AS or UAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) offers the better valuation at 265. 6x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AS or UAA?
On forward P/E, Amer Sports, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AS or UAA?
Over the past 5 years, Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) delivered a total return of +177. 5%, compared to -73. 8% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AS returned +177. 5% versus UAA's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AS or UAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Under Armour, Inc.
(UAA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Amer Sports, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AS is approximately 43% more volatile than UAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 69% for Under Armour, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AS or UAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -9. 4% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amer Sports, Inc. grew EPS 132. 6% year-over-year, compared to -190. 4% for Under Armour, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AS leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AS or UAA?
Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 4% net margin versus -3. 9% for Under Armour, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AS leads at 9. 1% versus -3. 6% for UAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AS leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AS or UAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amer Sports, Inc.
(AS) trades at 31. 1x forward P/E versus 55. 7x for Under Armour, Inc. — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AS: 31. 3% to $48. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — AS or UAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AS or UAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Under Armour, Inc.
(UAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UAA: -83. 3%, AS: +177. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AS and UAA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AS: 29.7% · UAA: -5.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.