Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASBP vs YCBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ASBP vs YCBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $7M | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2K | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $-328M |
| Gross Margin | 45.5% | 59.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10314.4% | -5.7% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $778M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $2M |
ASBP vs YCBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Biopharma Ho… (ASBP) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASBP vs YCBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -98.7% 10Y total return vs YCBD's -100.0%
- -13.2% ROA vs YCBD's -27.8%
YCBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth 39.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -18.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 2.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.5% revenue growth vs ASBP's -13.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.5% margin vs ASBP's -16K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs ASBP's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.8% vs ASBP's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -13.2% ROA vs YCBD's -27.8% |
ASBP vs YCBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YCBD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YCBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $19M annually — 9669.9x ASBP's $1,941. YCBD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASBP's -16352.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1,941 | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | -$286M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$328M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$853M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.5% | +59.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10314.4% | -5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16352.0% | -6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1811.5% | -16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +980.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.6% |
Valuation Metrics
YCBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $784M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.60x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASBP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YCBD scores 5/9 vs ASBP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | -27.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -47.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 107.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,633 | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $778M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.19x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASBP and YCBD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASBP five years ago would be worth $135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for YCBD. Over the past 12 months, YCBD leads with a -8.8% total return vs ASBP's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YCBD at -63.0% vs ASBP's -76.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.1% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -8.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -94.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.2% | -63.0% |
Risk & Volatility
YCBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YCBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASBP's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YCBD currently trades 32.4% from its 52-week high vs ASBP's 6.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $2.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $0.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.3% | +32.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.8 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
YCBD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASBP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ASBP vs YCBD: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — ASBP or YCBD?
Over the past 5 years, Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(ASBP) delivered a total return of -98. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASBP returned -98. 7% versus YCBD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — ASBP or YCBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), cbdMD, Inc.
(YCBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning ASBP is approximately 163% more volatile than YCBD relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — ASBP or YCBD?
cbdMD, Inc.
(YCBD) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 6% net margin versus -16352. 0% for Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YCBD leads at -11. 3% versus -10314. 4% for ASBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YCBD leads at 56. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — ASBP or YCBD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is ASBP or YCBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, cbdMD, Inc.
(YCBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66)). Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (ASBP) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YCBD: -100. 0%, ASBP: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between ASBP and YCBD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.