Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ASC vs TRMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$767M
5Y Perf.+221.7%
TRMD
TORM plc

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$3.33B
5Y Perf.+311.4%

ASC vs TRMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ASC logoASC
TRMD logoTRMD
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$767M$3.33B
Revenue (TTM)$310M$1.29B
Net Income (TTM)$41M$277M
Gross Margin28.8%47.2%
Operating Margin20.8%26.6%
Forward P/E6.5x6.6x
Total Debt$129M$1.23B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$272M

ASC vs TRMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ASC
TRMD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC)100321.7+221.7%
TORM plc (TRMD)100411.4+311.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ASC vs TRMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TRMD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ardmore Shipping Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
The Income Pick

ASC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 2.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 4.33x
  • Beta 0.48, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.33x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TRMD
TORM plc
The Growth Play

TRMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.0%
  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs ASC's 151.2%
  • 2.6% revenue growth vs ASC's -23.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMD logoTRMD2.6% revenue growth vs ASC's -23.6%
ValueASC logoASCLower P/E (6.5x vs 6.6x)
Quality / MarginsTRMD logoTRMD21.4% margin vs ASC's 13.2%
Stability / SafetyASC logoASCBeta 0.48 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
DividendsTRMD logoTRMD16.7% yield, vs ASC's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)TRMD logoTRMD+106.3% vs ASC's +92.9%
Efficiency (ROA)TRMD logoTRMD8.7% ROA vs ASC's 5.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs 9.0%

ASC vs TRMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ASCArdmore Shipping Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

TRMDTORM plc
FY 2024
Others
100.0%$1M

ASC vs TRMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTRMDLAGGINGASC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TRMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 4.2x ASC's $310M. TRMD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASC's 13.2%. On growth, ASC holds the edge at +1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$310M$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$101M$555M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$277M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$41M$242M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.8%+47.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.8%+26.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.2%+21.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.2%+18.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.1%-7.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.7%-43.0%
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TRMD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 76% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRMD's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASC's 7.4x.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Market CapShares × price$767M$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$849M$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.35x5.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.48x6.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.39x5.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x2.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x1.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.30x
TRMD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ASC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TRMD delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. ASC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMD's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASC scores 5/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+12.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.5%+8.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+18.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+22.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$82M$954M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$272M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$129M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.70x4.61x
ASC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $54,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,367 for ASC. Over the past 12 months, TRMD leads with a +106.3% total return vs ASC's +92.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMD at 16.1% vs ASC's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+80.7%+69.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+92.9%+106.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+54.7%+56.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+373.7%+447.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+151.2%+582.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.7%+16.1%
TRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ASC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ASC is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 94.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.20$34.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.18$15.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.9%+94.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10079.679.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded674K915K
ASC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TRMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates ASC as "Buy" and TRMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs 1.1% for ASC (target: $19). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.66% vs ASC's 2.00%.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts173
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+16.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38$5.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
TRMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TRMD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallTORM plc (TRMD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ASC vs TRMD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ASC or TRMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger pick with 2.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ASC or TRMD?

On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.

2x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or TRMD?

Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +447.

4%, compared to +373. 7% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +582. 9% versus ASC's +151. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ASC or TRMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

48β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 13% more volatile than ASC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 59% for TORM plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ASC or TRMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TORM plc (TRMD) is pulling ahead at 2.

6% versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TORM plc grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ASC or TRMD?

TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

3% net margin versus 13. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 26. 1% for ASC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ASC or TRMD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.

5x forward P/E versus 6. 6x for TORM plc — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 6. 4% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ASC or TRMD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC).

09

Is ASC or TRMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

54), 16. 7% yield, +582. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMD: +582. 9%, ASC: +151. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ASC and TRMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and TRMD (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ASC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRMD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ASC and TRMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ASC: 1.1% · TRMD: -7.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ASC: 13.2% · TRMD: 21.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ASC: 21.4x · TRMD: 5.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.