Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $770M | $4.38B | $3.36B | $4.46B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $1.04B | $1.29B | $676M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $502M | $277M | $546M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 51.8% | 47.2% | 40.6% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 38.8% | 26.6% | 44.4% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 8.6x | 6.6x | 8.5x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $619M | $1.23B | $576M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $752M | $272M | $117M | $831M |
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC) | 100 | 322.9 | +222.9% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 413.9 | +313.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, ASC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
STNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
TRMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.0%
- 2.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 80.8% margin vs ASC's 13.2%
- +160.2% vs TNK's +80.3%
- 20.1% ROA vs ASC's 5.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 9.0%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.29
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs ASC's 13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs TNK's +80.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs ASC's 5.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 9.0% |
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories
TNK leads 1 • INSW leads 1 • ASC leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 4.2x ASC's $310M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASC's 13.2%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $676M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $580M | $555M | $465M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $502M | $277M | $546M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $389M | $242M | $193M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +51.8% | +47.2% | +40.6% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +38.8% | +26.6% | +44.4% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +48.4% | +21.4% | +80.8% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +37.5% | +18.7% | +28.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | +46.2% | -7.8% | -91.3% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | +2.5% | -43.0% | +4.8% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 76% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs STNG's 0.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $770M | $4.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $852M | $4.3B | $4.3B | $4.9B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.43x | 12.05x | 5.21x | 14.48x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.51x | 8.58x | 6.62x | 8.52x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.36x | 0.23x | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.41x | 8.68x | 5.07x | 10.48x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 4.67x | 2.15x | 5.29x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.30x | 1.54x | 2.21x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.92x | 14.38x | 117.08x | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMD's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +15.9% | +12.9% | +27.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +12.6% | +8.7% | +20.1% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +7.2% | +18.0% | +9.4% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +8.4% | +22.8% | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.19x | 0.59x | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $82M | -$133M | $954M | $459M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $752M | $272M | $117M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $619M | $1.2B | $576M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.70x | 6.82x | 4.61x | 0.90x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,904 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs ASC's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.3% | +71.3% | +70.8% | +96.5% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.0% | +115.3% | +113.4% | +160.2% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.2% | +92.7% | +57.3% | +179.7% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +388.2% | +359.0% | +435.1% | +438.1% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.3% | +62.8% | +585.5% | +1014.5% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +24.4% | +16.3% | +40.9% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.28x | 0.54x | 0.43x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $87.39 | $34.88 | $91.58 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.18 | $37.96 | $15.79 | $35.60 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +96.9% | +94.9% | +98.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 60.5 | 62.3 | 67.3 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 677K | 1.2M | 924K | 597K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASC as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TRMD as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $85.33 | $35.00 | $83.33 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 31 | 3 | 13 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.0% | +16.6% | +3.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.69 | $5.48 | $2.92 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ASC vs STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger pick with 2.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 93% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for TORM plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TORM plc (TRMD) is pulling ahead at 2.
6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 13. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is ASC or STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, ASC: +155. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASC and STNG and TRMD and INSW and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and STNG (Energy) and TRMD (Energy) and INSW (Energy) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.