ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$767M
5Y Perf.+221.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ASC vs TK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TK
Teekay Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+364.8%
ASC vs TK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ASC | TK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $767M | $1.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $993M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 61.9x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $685M |
ASC vs TK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ASC
TK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC) | 100 | 321.7 | +221.7% |
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 464.8 | +364.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASC vs TK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ASC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Teekay Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
ASC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 151.2% 10Y total return vs TK's 87.8%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 61.9x)
- 13.2% margin vs TK's 7.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
TK
Teekay Corporation
The Income Pick
TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.7%
- Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 6.99x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TK | -16.7% revenue growth vs ASC's -23.6% |
| Value | ASC | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 61.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | ASC | 13.2% margin vs TK's 7.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TK | Beta 0.38 vs ASC's 0.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TK | 6.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ASC's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASC | +92.9% vs TK's +87.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASC | 5.5% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 9.0% vs 19.1% |
ASC vs TK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
ASC vs TK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTKLAGGINGASC
ASCArdmore Shipping Corp…
1leads
TKTeekay Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ASCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ASC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TK4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TK7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TK2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TK is the larger business by revenue, generating $993M annually — 3.2x ASC's $310M. ASC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, ASC holds the edge at +1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $993M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $334M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +28.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -29.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | -2.4% |
ASC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 55% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASC's 7.4x.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $767M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $849M | $525M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.35x | 9.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.48x | 61.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.39x | 1.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.92x |
TK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASC delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASC's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TK scores 6/9 vs ASC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $82M | -$620M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $685M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $66M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.70x | 69.29x |
TK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASC and TK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $52,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,367 for ASC. Over the past 12 months, ASC leads with a +92.9% total return vs TK's +87.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 49.8% vs ASC's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +54.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.9% | +87.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.7% | +235.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.7% | +422.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.2% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +49.8% |
Evenly matched — ASC and TK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASC and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TK is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASC's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.20 | $14.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.18 | $7.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.6 | 69.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 518K |
Evenly matched — ASC and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASC as "Buy" and TK as "Buy". For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs ASC's 2.00%.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | TKTeekay Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.2% |
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ASC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallTeekay Corporation (TK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ASC vs TK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASC or TK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger pick with -16.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASC or TK?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or TK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.
5%, compared to +373. 7% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASC returned +151. 2% versus TK's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASC or TK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning ASC is approximately 26% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 20% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASC or TK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teekay Corporation (TK) is pulling ahead at -16.
7% versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASC or TK?
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
2% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 26. 1% for ASC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASC leads at 34. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASC or TK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.
5x forward P/E versus 61. 9x for Teekay Corporation — 55. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASC or TK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC).
09Is ASC or TK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TK: +87. 8%, ASC: +151. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASC and TK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and TK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ASC: 1.1% · TK: -29.0%)Net Margin>
%
(ASC: 13.2% · TK: 7.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ASC: 21.4x · TK: 9.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.