Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $895M | $802M | $2.19B | $346M | $182M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.98B | $1.33B | $1.68B | $4.25B | $1.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $35M | $105M | $-254M | $-48M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 27.2% | 31.1% | 20.1% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 3.8% | 11.5% | -1.6% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | 17.5x | 13.7x | 11.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $70M | $548M | $159M | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $2M | $25M | $33M | $25M |
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 96.8 | -3.2% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 275.6 | +175.6% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 59.0 | -41.0% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.5%
- 198.8% 10Y total return vs HURN's 134.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.78x
HURN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 14.3% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 6.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.8% vs ASGN's -59.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ASGN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.8% vs ASGN's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
HURN leads 2 • KELYA leads 1 • ASGN leads 0 • TBI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 3.2x KFRC's $1.3B. HURN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.0%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $1.3B | $1.7B | $4.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $360M | $56M | $224M | -$27M | $70,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | $35M | $105M | -$254M | -$48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $43M | $183M | $114M | -$74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +27.2% | +31.1% | +20.1% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +3.8% | +11.5% | -1.6% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.2% | -6.0% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +3.3% | +10.9% | +2.7% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +0.1% | +13.8% | -11.9% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.9% | +2.2% | -6.5% | -3.2% | -165.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ASGN trades at a 64% valuation discount to HURN's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASGN's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 159.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $895M | $802M | $2.2B | $346M | $182M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $869M | $2.7B | $472M | $328M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.06x | 22.38x | 22.64x | -1.36x | -3.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.80x | 17.47x | 13.65x | 11.06x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.30x | 15.63x | 11.72x | — | 159.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.60x | 1.29x | 0.08x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 6.26x | 4.50x | 0.35x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.11x | 17.13x | 11.98x | 3.03x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-26 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASGN scores 5/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +27.2% | +21.0% | -26.0% | -16.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +9.2% | +7.1% | -11.3% | -7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +19.1% | +15.0% | -4.0% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +20.1% | +18.6% | -4.3% | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.56x | 1.04x | 0.16x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $68M | $524M | $126M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $2M | $25M | $33M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $70M | $548M | $159M | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.96x | — | 5.42x | -5.02x | -26.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $23,148 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,022 for ASGN. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +40.8% total return vs ASGN's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 21.8% vs ASGN's -31.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.1% | +41.3% | -22.7% | +14.5% | +37.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | +20.8% | -10.8% | -12.3% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.4% | -13.7% | +80.5% | -34.0% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | -14.8% | +131.5% | -57.0% | -78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | +198.8% | +134.1% | -31.8% | -68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.9% | -4.8% | +21.8% | -12.9% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASGN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs ASGN's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.53x | 0.82x | 1.01x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $60.75 | $47.48 | $186.78 | $14.94 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.31 | $24.49 | $116.12 | $7.98 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.5% | +92.4% | +70.8% | +65.7% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 18.4 | 70.7 | 54.9 | 63.4 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 927K | 308K | 249K | 355K | 375K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASGN as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", TBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.4% upside for ASGN (target: $38) vs -4.8% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs KELYA's 3.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.60 | $71.00 | $200.00 | $15.00 | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | — | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.0% | +6.3% | +7.6% | +3.6% | +0.6% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). HURN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
ASGN vs KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs TBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
On trailing P/E, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +131. 5%, compared to -79. 8% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +187. 9% versus TBI's -68. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 153% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HURN leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5.
8x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Kforce Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
5% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ASGN, HURN, TBI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASGN or KFRC or HURN or KELYA or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 5% yield, +187. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +187. 9%, ASGN: -41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASGN and KFRC and HURN and KELYA and TBI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASGN (Technology) and KFRC (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC, KELYA pay a dividend while ASGN, HURN, TBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.