Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Global
Asset Management
Asset Management
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $26M | $35M | $473M | $22.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $8M | $158M | $7.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-217M | $98K | $49M | $2.09B |
| Gross Margin | 89.2% | 41.7% | 96.0% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.7% | -35.3% | 38.4% | 29.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.5x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $83K | $6.40B | $860M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $25M | $42M | $3.38B |
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strive, Inc. (ASST) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 98.6 | -1.4% |
| T. Rowe Price Group… (TROW) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 476.2%, EPS growth 98.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 119.9%
- 476.2% revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
GROW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.2x)
TROW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 93.6% 10Y total return vs DHIL's 55.4%
- NIM 3.4% vs DHIL's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 476.2% revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs ASST's -74.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs ASST's 2.47 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TROW's 4.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.8% vs ASST's -77.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs ASST's -108.1%, ROIC 1.3% vs -40.0% |
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 5 of 6 categories
ASST leads 0 • GROW leads 0 • TROW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TROW is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.3B annually — 2513.2x ASST's $3M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASST's -74.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $8M | $158M | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | -$2M | $62M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$217M | $98,000 | $49M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | -$235,000 | $44.5B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.2% | +41.7% | +96.0% | +62.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | -35.3% | +38.4% | +29.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -74.6% | -4.0% | +30.9% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -9.8% | -57.4% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.9% | — | +25.3% | +3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, DHIL trades at a 13% valuation discount to TROW's 11.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TROW's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHIL's 110.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $35M | $473M | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$38M | $10M | $6.8B | $20.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.59x | -104.80x | 9.77x | 11.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.48x | 11.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 110.39x | 7.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.06x | 4.14x | 3.00x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.77x | 2.70x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 15.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-110 for ASST. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHIL scores 6/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -110.0% | +0.2% | +27.0% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -108.1% | +0.2% | +19.5% | +14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.0% | -4.7% | +1.3% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.1% | -6.2% | +26.0% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x | 36.26x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | -$24M | $6.4B | -$2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $25M | $42M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $83,000 | $6.4B | $860M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -186463.21x | 600.00x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHIL five years ago would be worth $12,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $435 for ASST. Over the past 12 months, DHIL leads with a +33.8% total return vs ASST's -77.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DHIL at 7.0% vs ASST's -45.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.6% | +7.7% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -77.2% | +27.8% | +33.8% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | +3.3% | +22.4% | +11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | -58.6% | +28.3% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +67.4% | +55.4% | +93.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.6% | +1.1% | +7.0% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASST's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ASST's 5.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 0.71x | 0.57x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $268.40 | $3.65 | $175.03 | $118.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.84 | $2.10 | $114.11 | $85.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.8% | +71.8% | +100.0% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 46.5 | 70.5 | 78.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 25K | 23K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DHIL and TROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply -2.3% upside for TROW (target: $101) vs -90.3% for ASST (target: $2). For income investors, DHIL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs GROW's 3.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.50 | — | — | $101.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% | +5.7% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | $9.98 | $5.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.6% | +3.6% | +2.8% |
DHIL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ASST vs GROW vs DHIL vs TROW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Strive, Inc.
(ASST) is the stronger pick with 476. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) a "Hold" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
On trailing P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. at 11. 2x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
Over the past 5 years, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) delivered a total return of +28. 3%, compared to -95. 6% for Strive, Inc. (ASST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROW returned +93. 6% versus ASST's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Strive, Inc. 's 2. 47β — meaning ASST is approximately 331% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strive, Inc.
(ASST) is pulling ahead at 476. 2% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strive, Inc. grew EPS 98. 6% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -591. 2% for Strive, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -620. 7% for ASST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TROW: -2. 3% to $101. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW?
In this comparison, DHIL (5.
7% yield), TROW (4. 9% yield), GROW (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ASST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASST or GROW or DHIL or TROW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Strive, Inc. (ASST) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +55. 4%, ASST: -95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASST and GROW and DHIL and TROW?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASST (Communication Services) and GROW (Financial Services) and DHIL (Financial Services) and TROW (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASST is a small-cap high-growth stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROW is a mid-cap deep-value stock. GROW, DHIL, TROW pay a dividend while ASST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 28%
- Gross Margin > 53%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.