ASTC vs MNTS

For growth investors, Momentus Inc.

(MNTS) is the stronger pick with -31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for Astrotech Corporation (ASTC). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) delivered a total return of -91.

8%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTC returned -99. 0% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 547% more volatile than ASTC relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Momentus Inc.

(MNTS) is pulling ahead at -31. 6% versus -37. 0% for Astrotech Corporation (ASTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 9% for Astrotech Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) is the more profitable company, earning -1320.

3% net margin versus -1653. 1% for Momentus Inc. — meaning it keeps -1320. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNTS leads at -1404. 1% versus -1404. 6% for ASTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

54)). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTC: -99. 0%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.