Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2.01B | $3.73B | $1.44B | $5.41B | $149.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.53B | $4.26B | $2.21B | $13.30B | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $20M | $-57M | $-39M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 9.0% | 42.5% | 17.4% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 0.8% | -2.6% | 0.1% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.1x | 140.9x | 65.9x | 34.7x | 78.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $338M | $0.00 | $430M | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $578M | $78M | $2.77B | $5.03B |
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC) | 100 | 83.2 | -16.8% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 297.4 | +197.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 56.4%, EPS growth -48.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.6%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs WELL's 223.1%
- 56.4% revenue growth vs OSCR's 27.5%
- Lower P/E (29.1x vs 78.4x)
ALHC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CLOV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, OSCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- 12.3% margin vs CLOV's -2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.4% revenue growth vs OSCR's 27.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.1x vs 78.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs CLOV's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs OSCR's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ASTH's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs CLOV's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 0.5% vs -34.0% |
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASTH leads 2 • ALHC leads 0 • CLOV leads 0 • OSCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.3B annually — 6.0x CLOV's $2.2B. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLOV's -2.6%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $4.3B | $2.2B | $13.3B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $141M | $66M | -$55M | $40M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $20M | -$57M | -$39M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $237M | $55M | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +9.0% | +42.5% | +17.4% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +0.8% | -2.6% | +0.1% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +0.5% | -2.6% | -0.3% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +5.6% | +2.5% | +21.0% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | +33.3% | +62.0% | +52.6% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.1% | +2.1% | — | +125.0% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ASTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.4x trailing earnings, ASTH trades at a 49% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASTH's 21.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $3.7B | $1.4B | $5.4B | $149.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.5B | $1.4B | $3.1B | $165.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.43x | -4932.43x | -16.59x | -12.35x | 153.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.12x | 140.93x | 65.89x | 34.65x | 78.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.39x | 77.12x | — | — | 66.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.94x | 0.75x | 0.46x | 13.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.19x | 20.16x | 4.72x | 5.58x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.24x | 32.95x | — | 5.11x | 52.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASTH leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALHC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-17 for CLOV. OSCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASTH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +11.5% | -17.1% | -3.3% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.8% | -9.6% | -0.6% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | — | -34.0% | — | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +2.9% | -24.5% | -25.3% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.93x | 1.89x | — | 0.44x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $649M | -$240M | -$78M | -$2.3B | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $578M | $78M | $2.8B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $338M | $0 | $430M | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.49x | 1.27x | — | -0.57x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASTH and CLOV and WELL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,271 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs CLOV's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs ASTH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.1% | -9.7% | +17.0% | +39.4% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.3% | +17.6% | -25.2% | +22.6% | +42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.1% | +152.4% | +221.7% | +177.5% | +189.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | -22.7% | -67.3% | -7.3% | +202.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +614.5% | +5.4% | -72.4% | -40.0% | +223.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +36.2% | +47.6% | +40.5% | +42.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASTH and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASTH currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CLOV's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.75x | 1.22x | 1.84x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.20 | $23.87 | $3.92 | $23.80 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.08 | $11.63 | $1.58 | $10.69 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +76.5% | +71.9% | +87.7% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.8 | 37.3 | 69.5 | 78.5 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 478K | 3.6M | 5.6M | 6.5M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASTH as "Buy", ALHC as "Buy", CLOV as "Hold", OSCR as "Hold", WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.1% upside for ALHC (target: $25) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17). For income investors, WELL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs ASTH's 0.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.20 | $24.83 | $3.33 | $16.75 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — | — | — | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ASTH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ASTH vs ALHC vs CLOV vs OSCR vs WELL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astrana Health, Inc.
(ASTH) is the stronger pick with 56. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 5% for Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR). Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) offers the better valuation at 78. 4x trailing P/E (29. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
On trailing P/E, Astrana Health, Inc.
(ASTH) is the cheapest at 78. 4x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, Astrana Health, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTH returned +614. 5% versus CLOV's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 1283% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 193% for Astrana Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astrana Health, Inc.
(ASTH) is pulling ahead at 56. 4% versus 27. 5% for Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WELL leads at 3. 3% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Astrana Health, Inc.
(ASTH) trades at 29. 1x forward P/E versus 140. 9x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 111. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALHC: 36. 1% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield), ASTH (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ALHC, CLOV, OSCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASTH or ALHC or CLOV or OSCR or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, OSCR: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASTH and ALHC and CLOV and OSCR and WELL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASTH (Healthcare) and ALHC (Healthcare) and CLOV (Healthcare) and OSCR (Healthcare) and WELL (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WELL pays a dividend while ASTH, ALHC, CLOV, OSCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.