ASTI vs BE

For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -100.

0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus ASTI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the lower-risk stock at 3.

61β versus Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's 4. 28β — meaning ASTI is approximately 19% more volatile than BE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.

3% versus -100. 0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 70. 2% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

Common Stock (ASTI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BE leads at 3. 6% versus 0. 0% for ASTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BE leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.

6% 10Y return). Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) carries a higher beta of 4. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, ASTI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ASTI (Energy) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ASTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.