Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $20.68B | $168M | $3M | $181.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $2M | $1M | $92.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-342M | $-293M | $-36M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | -46.5% | 66.0% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -405.7% | -183.1% | -24.4% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 4955.4x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $420M | $6M | $54.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.34B | $179M | $2M | $10.92B |
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 716.1 | +616.1% |
| Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs BA's 92.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs MNTS's -31.6%
SPCE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MNTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 0.2%
- Beta 0.97, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.19x
- 2.5% margin vs SPCE's -176.2%
- Beta 0.97 vs MNTS's 3.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs MNTS's -31.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs SPCE's -176.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.8% vs SPCE's -6.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -9.5% vs -7.3% |
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • SPCE leads 0 • MNTS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 89325.6x MNTS's $1M. BA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPCE's -176.2%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $2M | $1M | $92.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$237M | -$287M | -$24M | -$3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$342M | -$293M | -$36M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$460M | -$18M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | -46.5% | +66.0% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -183.1% | -24.4% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -176.2% | -34.5% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.0% | -277.1% | -17.9% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | -9.2% | +118.7% | +14.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.6% | +59.0% | -140.0% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASTS and SPCE and MNTS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.7B | $168M | $3M | $181.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.4B | $410M | $7M | $224.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.75x | -0.19x | -0.12x | 92.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 4955.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 291.65x | 23.88x | 1.37x | 2.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.15x | 0.21x | — | 32.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SPCE. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs SPCE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.1% | -129.5% | — | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.6% | -34.3% | -2.8% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.1% | -42.0% | -7.3% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.0% | -41.7% | -13.2% | -9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.30x | — | 9.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $242M | $4M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $179M | $2M | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $420M | $6M | $54.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.20x | -21.56x | -54.08x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $90,848 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +181.8% total return vs SPCE's -6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 141.0% vs MNTS's -74.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -19.1% | -16.4% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +181.8% | -6.3% | +169.7% | +23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1299.6% | -96.7% | -98.3% | +16.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +808.5% | -99.3% | -99.9% | +0.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +623.4% | -98.7% | -99.9% | +92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +141.0% | -68.1% | -74.2% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BA is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 30.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.82x | 1.91x | 3.48x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.89 | $6.64 | $15.98 | $254.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.47 | $2.13 | $0.44 | $176.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.4% | +40.1% | +30.0% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 42.9 | 47.5 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.7M | 6.1M | 1.8M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASTS as "Buy", SPCE as "Hold", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -0.4% for SPCE (target: $3). BA is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.65 | $2.65 | — | $263.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 17 | — | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
BA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ASTS vs SPCE vs MNTS vs BA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). The Boeing Company (BA) offers the better valuation at 92. 7x trailing P/E (4955. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +808. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +623. 4% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 259% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 30. 9% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA?
The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
5% net margin versus -49. 3% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BA leads at -6. 1% versus -53. 5% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 46.
6% to $103. 65.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA?
In this comparison, BA (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ASTS, SPCE, MNTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ASTS or SPCE or MNTS or BA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97)). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +92. 1%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASTS and SPCE and MNTS and BA?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASTS (Technology) and SPCE (Industrials) and MNTS (Industrials) and BA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.