ASX
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$74.84B
5Y Perf.+739.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ASX vs COHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.33B
5Y Perf.+229.0%
ASX vs COHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ASX | COHU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $74.84B | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $666.14B | $481M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47.13B | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 85.0x |
| Total Debt | $264.10B | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92.47B | $227M |
ASX vs COHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ASX
COHU
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 839.0 | +739.0% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 329.0 | +229.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASX vs COHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ASX leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cohu, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ASX
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
ASX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 27.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs COHU's 348.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Growth Leader
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 12.7% revenue growth vs ASX's 6.8%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COHU | 12.7% revenue growth vs ASX's 6.8% |
| Value | ASX | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 85.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | ASX | 7.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5% |
| Stability / Safety | ASX | Beta 1.60 vs COHU's 2.12 |
| Dividends | ASX | 1.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASX | +276.8% vs COHU's +206.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASX | 5.5% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 7.6% vs -5.7% |
ASX vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2014
ASX vs COHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASXLAGGINGCOHU
COHUCohu, Inc.
0leads
ASXASE Technology Holdin…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs COHUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ASX6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ASX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ASX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ASX1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASX and COHU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 1384.1x COHU's $481M. ASX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $666.1B | $481M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127.9B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47.1B | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.2B | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.1% | +60.6% |
Evenly matched — ASX and COHU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASX and COHU each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.8B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.3B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | -31.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | 84.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.20x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 216.85x |
Evenly matched — ASX and COHU each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. COHU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASX's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171.6B | $132M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92.5B | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264.1B | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.27x | -168.82x |
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $46,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,550 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, ASX leads with a +276.8% total return vs COHU's +206.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 71.1% vs COHU's 13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +103.0% | +101.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +276.8% | +206.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +400.9% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +368.1% | +35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +703.9% | +348.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.1% | +13.6% |
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASX is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $50.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.12 | $15.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 959K |
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ASX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASX as "Buy" and COHU as "Buy". ASX is the only dividend payer here at 0.97% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ASXASE Technology Ho… | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.46 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ASX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
ASX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallASE Technology Holding Co.,… (ASX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ASX vs COHU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASX or COHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX). ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) offers the better valuation at 58. 2x trailing P/E (1. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASX or COHU?
On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASX or COHU?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to +35. 5% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASX returned +703. 9% versus COHU's +348. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASX or COHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning COHU is approximately 32% more volatile than ASX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 71% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASX or COHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus 6. 8% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 27. 7% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASX leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASX or COHU?
ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASX leads at 7. 9% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COHU leads at 34. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASX or COHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 85. 0x for Cohu, Inc. — 83. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASX or COHU?
In this comparison, ASX (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. COHU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASX or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +703. 9% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASX: +703. 9%, COHU: +348. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASX and COHU?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ASX pays a dividend while COHU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ASX: 17.4% · COHU: 29.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.