Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Telecommunications Services
Software - Application
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Telecommunications Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $997M | $10.33B | $22M | $898M | $7.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $262M | $17M | $266M | $829M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $81M | $-50M | $-9M | $-36M | $366M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 57.2% | 4.9% | 37.9% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 1.4% | -50.0% | -10.3% | 49.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | — | — | — | 38.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $542M | $12M | $642M | $506M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $391M | — | $27M | $739M |
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterix Inc. (ATEX) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1826.9 | +1726.9% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 507.1 | +407.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 43.9%, EPS growth -24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.23x
- 43.9% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
- Better valuation composite
GSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +305.2% vs IDCC's +32.4%
LIQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.52 vs GSAT's 2.08, lower leverage
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
- 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
IDCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 436.7% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.9% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs GSAT's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs IDCC's +32.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC -7.9% vs -31.1% |
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATEX leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • SHEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATEX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $829M annually — 190.2x ATEX's $4M. ATEX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $262M | $17M | $266M | $829M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $84M | $93M | -$6M | $104M | $489M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $81M | -$50M | -$9M | -$36M | $366M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $151M | -$7M | -$276M | $580M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +57.2% | +4.9% | +37.9% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +1.4% | -50.0% | -10.3% | +49.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | -19.0% | -53.3% | -13.7% | +44.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +57.6% | -39.3% | -103.5% | +70.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +2.1% | +53.6% | -100.0% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -185.4% | -121.9% | +69.4% | -18.2% | -38.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IDCC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IDCC's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $997M | $10.3B | $22M | $898M | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $955M | $10.5B | $34M | $1.5B | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -87.23x | -138.10x | -2.59x | -22.86x | 23.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.84x | — | — | — | 38.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 119.09x | — | 13.80x | 12.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 165.25x | 41.28x | 1.35x | 2.51x | 8.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.31x | 28.58x | 2.14x | 0.92x | 8.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 57.85x | — | — | 13.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATEX delivers a 34.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. ATEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDCC scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.5% | -13.7% | -70.0% | -3.7% | +33.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.5% | -2.3% | -29.5% | -2.0% | +17.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -0.1% | -31.1% | -1.1% | +40.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.8% | -0.1% | — | -1.3% | +38.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.51x | 1.17x | 0.66x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $151M | $12M | $614M | -$233M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $391M | — | $27M | $739M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $542M | $12M | $642M | $506M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.07x | -13.46x | -0.65x | 11.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs IDCC's +32.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs LIQT's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +139.4% | +27.3% | +54.9% | +43.5% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +85.8% | +305.2% | +64.8% | +41.3% | +32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +484.1% | -31.3% | -13.6% | +251.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +393.8% | -96.1% | -27.9% | +303.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.5% | +201.8% | -90.9% | +21.6% | +436.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +80.1% | -11.8% | -4.8% | +52.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATEX and LIQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSAT's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATEX currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs IDCC's 67.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 2.08x | 0.52x | 0.89x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.67 | $82.85 | $3.35 | $17.34 | $412.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.58 | $17.24 | $1.30 | $9.66 | $205.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +98.3% | +68.9% | +93.6% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 66.4 | 57.0 | 55.2 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 302K | 1.5M | 50K | 300K | 393K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHEN and IDCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATEX as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, SHEN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.00 | — | $29.00 | $425.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 5 | — | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | +0.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.08 | — | $0.12 | $1.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ATEX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ATEX vs GSAT vs LIQT vs SHEN vs IDCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) is the stronger pick with 43. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anterix Inc. (ATEX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
On forward P/E, Anterix Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDCC returned +436. 7% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Globalstar, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning GSAT is approximately 297% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anterix Inc. (ATEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 151% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) is pulling ahead at 43. 9% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEX leads at 77. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -188. 6% for Anterix Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -194. 2% for ATEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Anterix Inc.
(ATEX) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for InterDigital, Inc. — 23. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ATEX, LIQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATEX or GSAT or LIQT or SHEN or IDCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, GSAT: +201. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATEX and GSAT and LIQT and SHEN and IDCC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATEX (Communication Services) and GSAT (Communication Services) and LIQT (Industrials) and SHEN (Communication Services) and IDCC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN, IDCC pay a dividend while ATEX, GSAT, LIQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.