Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHM vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ATHM vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.36B | $341.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.56B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $909M | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 137.0% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $97M | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.69B | $181.73B |
ATHM vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autohome Inc. (ATHM) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 68.2 | -31.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHM vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 9.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 5.56x
- Beta 0.81, yield 9.2%, current ratio 5.56x
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 84.5% 10Y total return vs ATHM's -2.3%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs ATHM's -2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs ATHM's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.1x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.5% margin vs BABA's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs BABA's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs ATHM's -20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs ATHM's 3.1%, ROIC 9.6% vs 3.4% |
ATHM vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATHM vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 284.2x ATHM's $3.6B. ATHM is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BABA's 12.2%. On growth, BABA holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $416M | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $909M | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +137.0% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -180.8% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATHM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ATHM trades at a 45% valuation discount to BABA's 18.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ATHM's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BABA's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $341.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $351.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.92x | 17.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.76x | 4.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.59x | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.03x | 29.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for ATHM. ATHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BABA's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs ATHM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $97M | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,453 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,721 for ATHM. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.4% total return vs ATHM's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.6% vs ATHM's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.6% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.3% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.8% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHM and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs ATHM's 64.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.92 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.74 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.7% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 765K | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
ATHM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ATHM as "Buy" and BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.5% upside for ATHM (target: $44) vs 37.3% for BABA (target: $194). For income investors, ATHM offers the higher dividend yield at 9.22% vs BABA's 1.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.67 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.2% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.17 | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +3.8% |
ATHM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BABA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ATHM vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHM or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Autohome Inc. (ATHM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHM or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHM or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -35.
5%, compared to -72. 8% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +84. 5% versus ATHM's -2. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHM or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 1. 21β — meaning BABA is approximately 50% more volatile than ATHM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Autohome Inc. (ATHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 23% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHM or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus -2. 0% for Autohome Inc. (ATHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -78. 3% for Autohome Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BABA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHM or BABA?
Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 5% net margin versus 13. 1% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATHM leads at 14. 3% versus 14. 1% for BABA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATHM leads at 78. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHM or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 4.
1x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for Autohome Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATHM: 125. 5% to $43. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHM or BABA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the highest yield at 9. 2%, versus 1. 3% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA).
09Is ATHM or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 9. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHM: -2. 3%, BABA: +84. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHM and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATHM (Communication Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 3.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.