Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHR vs MRVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
ATHR vs MRVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $48M | $149.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $8.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | -312.1% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2.64B |
ATHR vs MRVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aether Holdings, In… (ATHR) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 294.9 | +194.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHR vs MRVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 9.21x
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 9.21x
MRVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 17.2% 10Y total return vs ATHR's -31.0%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.6% margin vs ATHR's -301.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs MRVL's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.6% vs ATHR's -61.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs ATHR's -102.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs -24.7% |
ATHR vs MRVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATHR vs MRVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 6003.3x ATHR's $1M. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 32.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATHR's -3.0%. On growth, MRVL holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +32.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATHR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $149.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $150.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.69x | 56.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 34.92x | 18.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.68x | 10.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 106.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVL delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-122 for ATHR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRVL scores 7/9 vs ATHR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.2% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.7% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -140.4% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRVL five years ago would be worth $38,065 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,904 for ATHR. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +181.6% total return vs ATHR's -61.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRVL at 61.5% vs ATHR's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.8% | +92.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.3% | +181.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +321.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +280.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +1723.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.6% | +61.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHR and MRVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRVL currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs ATHR's 20.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 2.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $175.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.90 | $53.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.2% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 77.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 24.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ATHR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MRVL is the only dividend payer here at 0.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $129.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 72 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
MRVL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATHR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ATHR vs MRVL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHR or MRVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) offers the better valuation at 56. 1x trailing P/E (44. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) a "Buy" — based on 72 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATHR or MRVL?
Over the past 5 years, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) delivered a total return of +280. 7%, compared to -31. 0% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +1724% versus ATHR's -31. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATHR or MRVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aether Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (ATHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 194% more volatile than ATHR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATHR or MRVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -265. 2% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRVL leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATHR or MRVL?
Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 6% net margin versus -227. 5% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 32. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRVL leads at 16. 1% versus -235. 5% for ATHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATHR leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATHR or MRVL?
In this comparison, MRVL (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ATHR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATHR or MRVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aether Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (ATHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75)). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHR: -31. 0%, MRVL: +1724%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATHR and MRVL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.