ATI vs GE

For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for ATI Inc. (ATI). GE Aerospace (GE) offers the better valuation at 37. 5x trailing P/E (40. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATI Inc. (ATI) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, GE Aerospace (GE) is the cheapest at 37.

5x versus ATI Inc. at 57. 9x. On forward P/E, ATI Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.

(ATI) delivered a total return of +567. 3%, compared to +370. 5% for GE Aerospace (GE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATI returned +962. 0% versus GE's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GE Aerospace (GE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

14β versus ATI Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning ATI is approximately 33% more volatile than GE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ATI Inc. (ATI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.

5% versus 5. 2% for ATI Inc. (ATI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Aerospace grew EPS 36. 2% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for ATI Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 8. 8% for ATI Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 13. 8% for ATI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, ATI Inc.

(ATI) trades at 38. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for GE Aerospace — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 26. 3% to $386. 20.

In this comparison, GE (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ATI Inc.

(ATI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+962. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATI: +962. 0%, GE: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ATI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.