Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GE vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
GE vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $319.54B | $238.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48.35B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8.66B | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 40.4x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $20.49B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12.39B | $7.43B |
GE vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 935.0 | +835.0% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 273.9 | +173.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GE vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7%
- 17.9% margin vs RTX's 8.0%
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.5%
- 231.2% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.5x vs 40.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs RTX's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs GE's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.4% vs RTX's +40.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs RTX's 4.3%, ROIC 24.7% vs 6.7% |
GE vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GE vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 1.9x GE's $48.4B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RTX's 8.0%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48.4B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.9B | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.7B | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.5B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, RTX trades at a 5% valuation discount to GE's 37.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RTX's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GE's 32.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $319.5B | $238.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327.6B | $270.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.48x | 35.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.44x | 25.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.80x | 20.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.97x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.27x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.99x | 29.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs GE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.8% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.7% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12.4B | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20.5B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.69x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $47,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,270 for RTX. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +47.4% total return vs RTX's +40.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.6% vs RTX's 24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.5% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.4% | +40.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +284.0% | +92.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.5% | +122.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.3% | +231.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.6% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GE and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GE's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GE currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs RTX's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $348.48 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $205.92 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 29.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GE as "Buy" and RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs 26.3% for GE (target: $386). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $386.20 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.36 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +0.0% |
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RTX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GE vs RTX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GE or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Aerospace (GE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GE or RTX?
On trailing P/E, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the cheapest at 35.
6x versus GE Aerospace at 37. 5x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GE or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +370.
5%, compared to +122. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +231. 2% versus GE's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GE or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus GE Aerospace's 1. 14β — meaning GE is approximately 124% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GE or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RTX Corporation grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to 36. 2% for GE Aerospace. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GE or RTX?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 7. 6% for RTX Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GE or RTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25.
5x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for GE Aerospace — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 2% to $224. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — GE or RTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 4% for GE Aerospace (GE).
09Is GE or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +231. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +231. 2%, GE: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GE and RTX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while GE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.