Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATI vs MTRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
ATI vs MTRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $22.26B | $3.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.59B | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $426M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 37.9x | 30.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $601M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $417M | $14M |
ATI vs MTRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATI Inc. (ATI) | 100 | 1873.2 | +1773.2% |
| Materion Corporation (MTRN) | 100 | 363.9 | +263.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATI vs MTRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs MTRN's 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 2.66x
- 9.3% margin vs MTRN's 4.0%
MTRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- Beta 1.62, yield 0.3%, current ratio 3.11x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs ATI's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.0x vs 37.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs MTRN's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs MTRN's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ATI's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.9% vs ATI's +133.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs MTRN's 4.2%, ROIC 14.5% vs 6.0% |
ATI vs MTRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATI vs MTRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 2.4x MTRN's $1.9B. ATI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTRN's 4.0%. On growth, MTRN holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $837M | $187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $426M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $552M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +15.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.9% | +8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MTRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 53.4x trailing earnings, MTRN trades at a 6% valuation discount to ATI's 57.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTRN's 24.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATI's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.3B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.8B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 57.05x | 53.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.92x | 29.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.30x | 24.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.85x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.03x | 4.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 66.72x | 79.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATI delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for MTRN. MTRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATI's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATI scores 8/9 vs MTRN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $587M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $417M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $601M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.78x | 4.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATI five years ago would be worth $67,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,559 for MTRN. Over the past 12 months, MTRN leads with a +163.9% total return vs ATI's +133.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATI at 62.7% vs MTRN's 22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.4% | +48.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +133.1% | +163.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +330.9% | +84.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +572.7% | +155.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1050.2% | +724.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.7% | +22.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ATI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATI is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTRN's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.11 | $201.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.63 | $70.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
MTRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ATI as "Buy" and MTRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.6% upside for ATI (target: $173) vs -15.7% for MTRN (target: $161). MTRN is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $173.40 | $161.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.3% |
ATI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTRN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
ATI vs MTRN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATI or MTRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the stronger pick with 6.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for ATI Inc. (ATI). Materion Corporation (MTRN) offers the better valuation at 53. 4x trailing P/E (30. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATI Inc. (ATI) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATI or MTRN?
On trailing P/E, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the cheapest at 53.
4x versus ATI Inc. at 57. 0x. On forward P/E, Materion Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATI or MTRN?
Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.
(ATI) delivered a total return of +572. 7%, compared to +155. 6% for Materion Corporation (MTRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATI returned +1050% versus MTRN's +724. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATI or MTRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ATI Inc.
(ATI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Materion Corporation's 1. 62β — meaning MTRN is approximately 7% more volatile than ATI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Materion Corporation (MTRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 102% for ATI Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATI or MTRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Materion Corporation (MTRN) is pulling ahead at 6.
0% versus 5. 2% for ATI Inc. (ATI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for ATI Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATI leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATI or MTRN?
ATI Inc.
(ATI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 4. 2% for Materion Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATI leads at 13. 8% versus 6. 5% for MTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATI leads at 21. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATI or MTRN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Materion Corporation (MTRN) trades at 30.
0x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for ATI Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATI: 6. 6% to $173. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATI or MTRN?
In this comparison, MTRN (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATI or MTRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ATI Inc.
(ATI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1050% 10Y return). Materion Corporation (MTRN) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATI: +1050%, MTRN: +724. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATI and MTRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATI (Industrials) and MTRN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.