Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Machinery
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $58.41B | $11.47B | $79.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $18.38B | $4.84B | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-120M | $1.78B | $404M | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 39.2% | 30.0% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 14.2% | 11.2% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.0x | 28.3x | 29.0x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $932M | $3.16B | $572M | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $507M | $585M | $388M | $1.54B |
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atkore Inc. (ATKR) | 100 | 275.6 | +175.6% |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| Applied Industrial … (AIT) | 100 | 535.1 | +435.1% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATKR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 21.7x)
- 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
GWW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.83x
- 4.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0%
- Beta 0.89 vs ATKR's 1.69
AIT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.3% 10Y total return vs GWW's 463.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 31.0%, current ratio 3.32x
- PEG 0.39 vs EMR's 4.81
- +44.6% vs ATKR's +12.1%
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 13.3% margin vs ATKR's -4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs ATKR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs ATKR's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs ATKR's +12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs ATKR's -4.2%, ROIC 32.1% vs 9.0% |
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories
ATKR leads 1 • GWW leads 1 • AIT leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 6.4x ATKR's $2.9B. EMR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATKR's -4.2%. On growth, GWW holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $18.4B | $4.8B | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $291M | $2.8B | $592M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$120M | $1.8B | $404M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $1.4B | $437M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +39.2% | +30.0% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +14.2% | +11.2% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +9.7% | +8.3% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +7.5% | +9.0% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +10.1% | +7.3% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | +18.2% | +3.1% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ATKR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.7x trailing earnings, AIT trades at a 12% valuation discount to EMR's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AIT offers better value at 0.41x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $58.4B | $11.5B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $61.0B | $11.7B | $91.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -164.38x | 34.86x | 30.67x | 34.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.02x | 28.29x | 29.00x | 21.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.56x | 0.41x | 7.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.35x | 20.71x | 20.85x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 3.26x | 2.51x | 4.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 14.30x | 6.53x | 3.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.44x | 43.88x | 24.66x | 29.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW delivers a 43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-9 for ATKR. AIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWW's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWW scores 8/9 vs ATKR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | +43.1% | +21.6% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | +19.7% | +12.9% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +32.1% | +18.7% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +39.7% | +19.5% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.76x | 0.31x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $425M | $2.6B | $184M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $507M | $585M | $388M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $932M | $3.2B | $572M | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.68x | 22.63x | 42.94x | 6.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AIT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIT five years ago would be worth $30,484 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,629 for ATKR. Over the past 12 months, AIT leads with a +44.6% total return vs ATKR's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AIT at 34.6% vs ATKR's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +23.2% | +19.7% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.1% | +19.1% | +44.6% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | +85.3% | +143.8% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.7% | +173.2% | +204.8% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +380.6% | +463.0% | +627.9% | +206.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.6% | +22.8% | +34.6% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GWW and AIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWW is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATKR's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIT currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs EMR's 85.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.89x | 1.07x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.06 | $1286.56 | $316.82 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.49 | $906.52 | $213.78 | $108.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +95.9% | +98.0% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 58.3 | 72.6 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 384K | 239K | 285K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATKR and GWW and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATKR as "Hold", GWW as "Hold", AIT as "Buy", EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs -6.2% for GWW (target: $1157). For income investors, ATKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs AIT's 0.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.00 | $1157.43 | $322.33 | $161.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 38 | 15 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 37 | 15 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $9.73 | $1.64 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +1.8% | +1.3% | +1.6% |
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ATKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ATKR vs GWW vs AIT vs EMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E (29. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
(AIT) is the cheapest at 30. 7x versus Emerson Electric Co. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Atkore Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
(AIT) delivered a total return of +204. 8%, compared to -13. 7% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIT returned +627. 9% versus EMR's +206. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Atkore Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning ATKR is approximately 90% more volatile than GWW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 76% for W. W. Grainger, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Emerson Electric Co. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Atkore Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus -0. 5% for Atkore Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 8. 3% for ATKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Atkore Inc. (ATKR) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 0x for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT).
09Is ATKR or GWW or AIT or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 0. 8% yield, +463. 0% 10Y return). Atkore Inc. (ATKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWW: +463. 0%, ATKR: +380. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATKR and GWW and AIT and EMR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.