Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATON vs SUNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
ATON vs SUNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $285K | $102M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $26M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 53.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $6M |
ATON vs SUNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaTON Capital Co… (ATON) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATON vs SUNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, ATON is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 15.4%
- Rev growth 148.1%, EPS growth -5.0%
- -11.3% 10Y total return vs ATON's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs ATON's 70.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs ATON's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ATON's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 15.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.6% vs ATON's -97.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ATON's -64.4%, ROIC 6.0% vs -436.5% |
ATON vs SUNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS and ATON operate at a comparable scale, with $26M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $26M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +53.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +108.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.4% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ATON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $284,630 | $102M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $218M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ATON.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.4% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2472.67x | 3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUNS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUNS five years ago would be worth $8,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for ATON. Over the past 12 months, SUNS leads with a -15.6% total return vs ATON's -97.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUNS at -3.9% vs ATON's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -68.5% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.3% | -15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -11.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -11.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.4% | -3.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATON's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUNS currently trades 64.8% from its 52-week high vs ATON's 1.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.80 | $11.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $7.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.7% | +64.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.6 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 105K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SUNS is the only dividend payer here at 15.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +15.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SUNS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATON vs SUNS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATON or SUNS a better buy right now?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATON or SUNS?
Over the past 5 years, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) delivered a total return of -11. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUNS returned -11. 3% versus ATON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATON or SUNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus AlphaTON Capital Corp. 's 1. 50β — meaning ATON is approximately 78% more volatile than SUNS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATON or SUNS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
grew EPS -5. 0% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for AlphaTON Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATON or SUNS?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUNS leads at 64. 2% versus 0. 0% for ATON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATON or SUNS?
In this comparison, SUNS (15.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ATON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATON or SUNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 15. 4% yield). AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUNS: -11. 3%, ATON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATON and SUNS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATON (Financial Services) and SUNS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock. SUNS pays a dividend while ATON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.