Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $3.36B | $14.65B | $60.85B | $4.86B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.80B | $3.69B | $5.68B | $981M | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $456M | $958M | $54M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 25.9% | 68.8% | 61.9% | 44.4% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 17.7% | 16.0% | 11.9% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 27.2x | 20.0x | 39.8x | 38.2x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.70B | $1.39B | $2.97B | $342M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226M | $253M | $1.87B | $381M | $675M |
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATS Corporation (ATS) | 100 | 239.1 | +139.1% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Keysight Technologi… (KEYS) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
| Novanta Inc. (NOVT) | 100 | 132.7 | +32.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TRMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.46
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 23.9%, current ratio 1.09x
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 38.2x), PEG 8.15 vs 11.61
- Beta 1.46 vs MKSI's 2.64, lower leverage
KEYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- PEG 4.97 vs NOVT's 11.61
- Beta 1.71, current ratio 2.35x
- 16.9% margin vs ATS's 0.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NOVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs ATS's -16.5%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +306.1% vs TRMB's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs ATS's -16.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 38.2x), PEG 8.15 vs 11.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs ATS's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs MKSI's 2.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs TRMB's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs ATS's 0.4%, ROIC 11.5% vs 0.2% |
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMB leads 1 • MKSI leads 1 • ATS leads 0 • NOVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 5.8x NOVT's $981M. KEYS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATS's 0.7%. On growth, KEYS holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $3.7B | $5.7B | $981M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $228M | $785M | $1.2B | $179M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $456M | $958M | $54M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $253M | $1.5B | $48M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +68.8% | +61.9% | +44.4% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +17.7% | +16.0% | +11.9% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +12.4% | +16.9% | +5.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +6.9% | +25.8% | +4.9% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | +11.8% | +23.3% | +8.5% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +55.6% | +68.0% | -2.2% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.3x trailing earnings, TRMB trades at a 62% valuation discount to NOVT's 92.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KEYS offers better value at 9.08x vs NOVT's 28.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $14.7B | $60.9B | $4.9B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $15.8B | $62.0B | $4.8B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -163.12x | 35.34x | 72.70x | 92.71x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.21x | 20.01x | 39.84x | 38.25x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.39x | 9.08x | 28.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.43x | 20.05x | 50.65x | 27.00x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 4.08x | 11.32x | 4.96x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 2.54x | 10.44x | 3.81x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 110.00x | 47.50x | 100.38x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KEYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KEYS delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $1 for ATS. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ATS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +8.0% | +15.4% | +4.1% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +5.0% | +8.3% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +6.8% | +11.5% | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +7.8% | +11.0% | +8.3% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.24x | 0.51x | 0.26x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $1.1B | $1.1B | -$39M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226M | $253M | $1.9B | $381M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.4B | $3.0B | $342M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.81x | 12.26x | 11.03x | 4.89x | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEYS five years ago would be worth $24,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,797 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs TRMB's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs ATS's -7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | -21.0% | +71.7% | +22.6% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.5% | -6.7% | +137.2% | +14.6% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +30.1% | +147.9% | -15.2% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | -22.0% | +147.4% | +5.7% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.7% | +166.8% | +1279.4% | +853.7% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.2% | +9.2% | +35.3% | -5.3% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATS and TRMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKSI's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATS currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 1.46x | 1.71x | 2.02x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.06 | $87.50 | $367.12 | $149.95 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.85 | $61.63 | $146.23 | $98.27 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +70.7% | +96.6% | +90.9% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 36.8 | 75.0 | 62.6 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 1.7M | 1.3M | 375K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATS as "Hold", TRMB as "Buy", KEYS as "Buy", NOVT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for TRMB (target: $95) vs -18.5% for KEYS (target: $289). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $95.00 | $289.25 | $150.00 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 28 | 15 | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +5.9% | +0.6% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ATS vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for ATS Corporation (ATS). Trimble Inc. (TRMB) offers the better valuation at 35. 3x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trimble Inc. (TRMB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the cheapest at 35. 3x versus Novanta Inc. at 92. 7x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Keysight Technologies, Inc. wins at 4. 97x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) delivered a total return of +147. 4%, compared to -22. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEYS returned +1279% versus TRMB's +166. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus MKS Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning MKSI is approximately 80% more volatile than TRMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -16. 5% for ATS Corporation (ATS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -114. 7% for ATS Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATS leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 7% net margin versus -1. 1% for ATS Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KEYS leads at 17. 6% versus 0. 4% for ATS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 97x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Keysight Technologies, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 53. 6% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ATS, TRMB, KEYS, NOVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATS or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1279% 10Y return). ATS Corporation (ATS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEYS: +1279%, ATS: +282. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATS and TRMB and KEYS and NOVT and MKSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATS (Industrials) and TRMB (Technology) and KEYS (Technology) and NOVT (Technology) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.