Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
KXIN
Kaixin Auto Holdings

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-72.8%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-51.9%

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATXG logoATXG
KXIN logoKXIN
CANG logoCANG
CLPS logoCLPS
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$3M$5M$250M$25M
Revenue (TTM)$4M$95K$3.46B$299M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-66M$-178M$-4M
Gross Margin14.7%-20.4%13.6%22.8%
Operating Margin-49.4%-303.1%7.3%-1.4%
Forward P/E5.7x
Total Debt$22M$1M$170M$34M
Cash & Equiv.$325K$2M$1.29B$28M

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATXG
KXIN
CANG
CLPS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG)1000.5-99.5%
Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN)1000.0-100.0%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10027.2-72.8%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10048.1-51.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cango Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
The Defensive Pick

ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
Best for: defensive
KXIN
Kaixin Auto Holdings
The Secondary Option

KXIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • -44.9% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
  • -2.3% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs -36.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -181.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLPS logoCLPS15.2% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsCLPS logoCLPS-1.3% margin vs KXIN's -694.9%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs CANG's 2.25
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-5.4% vs KXIN's -98.8%
Efficiency (ROA)CANG logoCANG-2.3% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs -36.0%

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATXGAddentax Group Corp.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$4M
KXINKaixin Auto Holdings
FY 2023
New-car wholesales
95.3%$30M
Used-car sales
4.5%$1M
Technology Service
0.2%$67,000
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCANGLAGGINGKXIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CANG and CLPS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 36417.5x KXIN's $95,000. CLPS is the more profitable business, keeping -1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$95,000$3.5B$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$947,630-$24M$333M-$1M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$66M-$178M-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M-$3M$0$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.7%-20.4%+13.6%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-49.4%-303.1%+7.3%-1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.0%-694.9%-5.2%-1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-34.3%-32.4%-154.0%-2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.9%+58.3%+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-136.8%+88.7%+3.6%+75.8%
Evenly matched — CANG and CLPS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Market CapShares × price$3M$5M$250M$25M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$25M$4M$85M$31M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.38x-0.10x5.66x-3.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.67x2.12x0.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.09x0.30x0.42x0.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.56x
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CANG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CANG delivers a -4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATXG scores 4/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-31.7%-5.9%-4.1%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.4%-3.2%-2.3%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.9%-36.0%+4.6%-7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.9%-44.5%+4.5%-9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94342
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x0.08x0.04x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$22M-$1M-$1.1B$6M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$324,953$2M$1.3B$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22M$1M$170M$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.67x-88.45x-1.87x
CANG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs KXIN's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 0.4% vs KXIN's -96.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.9%-95.0%-62.0%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-53.4%-98.8%-73.7%-5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.9%-100.0%+1.2%+0.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-100.0%-14.2%-69.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-100.0%-44.9%-78.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-65.4%-96.7%+0.4%+0.2%
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.48x2.13x2.49x0.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.90$832.50$2.88$1.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.37$4.10$0.33$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+17.5%+0.5%+18.6%+48.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.633.058.649.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded157K38K1.3M15K
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…KXIN logoKXINKaixin Auto Holdi…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises53
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.3%0.0%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallCango Inc. (CANG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATXG vs KXIN vs CANG vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -43. 2% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning CANG is approximately 1177% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.

2% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. ATXG, KXIN, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is ATXG or KXIN or CANG or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

19), 14. 6% yield). Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between ATXG and KXIN and CANG and CLPS?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATXG (Industrials) and KXIN (Consumer Cyclical) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ATXG, KXIN, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KXIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATXG and KXIN and CANG and CLPS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATXG: -7.9% · KXIN: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.