AUDC
AudioCodes Ltd.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$229M
5Y Perf.-76.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AUDC vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Semiconductors
Market Cap$5.05T
5Y Perf.+2238.6%
AUDC vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AUDC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $229M | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $247M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 65.3% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $10.61B |
AUDC vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AUDC
NVDA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2338.6 | +2238.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUDC vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NVDA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AudioCodes Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AUDC
AudioCodes Ltd.
The Income Pick
AUDC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 2.21x
- Beta 1.39, yield 4.4%, current ratio 2.21x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Growth Play
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs AUDC's 190.3%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs AUDC's 1.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs AUDC's 1.4% |
| Value | AUDC | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 25.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% margin vs AUDC's 2.8% |
| Stability / Safety | AUDC | Beta 1.39 vs NVDA's 1.73 |
| Dividends | AUDC | 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NVDA | +82.9% vs AUDC's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs AUDC's 2.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs 5.8% |
AUDC vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2026
AUDC vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGAUDC
AUDCAudioCodes Ltd.
1leads
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AUDCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NVDA6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AUDC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NVDA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NVDA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 872.9x AUDC's $247M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUDC's 2.8%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $247M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.2% | +97.8% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AUDC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, AUDC trades at a 35% valuation discount to NVDA's 42.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AUDC's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 37.9x.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $229M | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $253M | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.55x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.94x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.83x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.00x | 52.21x |
AUDC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $4 for AUDC. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUDC's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUDC scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.27x | 545.03x |
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,388 for AUDC. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs AUDC's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs AUDC's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.8% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.1% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.3% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +92.4% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AUDC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUDC is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs AUDC's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.50 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.95 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.3% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 166.2M |
Evenly matched — AUDC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AUDC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AUDC as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.5% upside for AUDC (target: $19) vs 34.3% for NVDA (target: $279). AUDC is the only dividend payer here at 4.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | AUDCAudioCodes Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — AUDC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AUDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AUDC vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUDC or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC). AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUDC or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, AudioCodes Ltd.
(AUDC) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 42. 4x. On forward P/E, AudioCodes Ltd. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUDC or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to -66.
1% for AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus AUDC's +190. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUDC or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AudioCodes Ltd.
(AUDC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 24% more volatile than AUDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 40% for AudioCodes Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUDC or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 1. 4% for AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -38. 0% for AudioCodes Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUDC or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 3. 6% for AudioCodes Ltd. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 5. 7% for AUDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUDC or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AudioCodes Ltd.
(AUDC) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for NVIDIA Corporation — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AUDC: 122. 5% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUDC or NVDA?
In this comparison, AUDC (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AUDC or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AudioCodes Ltd.
(AUDC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 4% yield, +190. 3% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUDC: +190. 3%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUDC and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUDC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. AUDC pays a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AUDC: 2.9% · NVDA: 73.2%)Net Margin>
%
(AUDC: 2.8% · NVDA: 55.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AUDC: 27.5x · NVDA: 42.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.