Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AUGO vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AUGO
Aura Minerals

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.88B
5Y Perf.+27.6%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$228.53B
5Y Perf.+10.4%

AUGO vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AUGO logoAUGO
LIN logoLIN
IndustryOther Precious MetalsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$6.88B$228.53B
Revenue (TTM)$922M$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$-79M$7.13B
Gross Margin57.4%46.0%
Operating Margin49.5%28.8%
Forward P/E7.5x27.6x
Total Debt$411M$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$286M$5.06B

Quick Verdict: AUGO vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AUGO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Linde plc is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AUGO
Aura Minerals
The Growth Play

AUGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 55.1%, EPS growth -128.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
  • Beta 1.96, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.97x
  • 55.1% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 1.2%
  • 374.6% 10Y total return vs AUGO's 257.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAUGO logoAUGO55.1% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
ValueAUGO logoAUGOLower P/E (7.5x vs 27.6x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs AUGO's -8.6%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.23 vs AUGO's 1.96, lower leverage
DividendsAUGO logoAUGO1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)AUGO logoAUGO+246.3% vs LIN's +10.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs AUGO's -5.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs 93.4%

AUGO vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AUGOAura Minerals

Segment breakdown not available.

LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

AUGO vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGAUGO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 37.6x AUGO's $922M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUGO's -8.6%. On growth, AUGO holds the edge at +87.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$922M$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$531M$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$79M$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$92M$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.4%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+49.5%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.6%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.0%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+87.5%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%+13.4%
Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AUGO's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 19.7x.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$6.9B$228.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.0B$250.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-85.53x33.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.55x27.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.35x19.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.46x6.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share25.56x5.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF87.65x44.91x
Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-37 for AUGO. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUGO's 1.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs AUGO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.6%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.9%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+93.4%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+47.5%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.55x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$125M$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$286M$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$411M$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.77x34.52x
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AUGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AUGO five years ago would be worth $35,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,251 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, AUGO leads with a +246.3% total return vs LIN's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AUGO at 52.0% vs LIN's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+65.5%+15.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+246.3%+10.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+251.4%+39.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+254.0%+72.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+257.6%+374.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+52.0%+11.7%
AUGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUGO's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs AUGO's 74.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$110.32$521.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.24$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.4%+94.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.846.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded858K2.3M
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AUGO as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for LIN (target: $559) vs -35.7% for AUGO (target: $53). For income investors, AUGO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs LIN's 1.22%.

MetricAUGO logoAUGOAura MineralsLIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$52.80$559.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts228
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises36
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+2.0%
Evenly matched — AUGO and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). AUGO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AUGO vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AUGO or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aura Minerals (AUGO) is the stronger pick with 55.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aura Minerals (AUGO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AUGO or LIN?

On forward P/E, Aura Minerals is actually cheaper at 7.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AUGO or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Aura Minerals (AUGO) delivered a total return of +254.

0%, compared to +72. 5% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +374. 6% versus AUGO's +257. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AUGO or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

23β versus Aura Minerals's 1. 96β — meaning AUGO is approximately 734% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 155% for Aura Minerals — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AUGO or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aura Minerals (AUGO) is pulling ahead at 55.

1% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -128. 6% for Aura Minerals. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUGO leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AUGO or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -8. 6% for Aura Minerals — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUGO leads at 49. 2% versus 26. 3% for LIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUGO leads at 58. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AUGO or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Aura Minerals (AUGO) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for Linde plc — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIN: 13. 4% to $559. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AUGO or LIN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Aura Minerals (AUGO) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Linde plc (LIN).

09

Is AUGO or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

23), 1. 2% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Aura Minerals (AUGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +374. 6%, AUGO: +257. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AUGO and LIN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AUGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AUGO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AUGO and LIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AUGO: 87.5% · LIN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.