AUGO vs PAAS

For growth investors, Aura Minerals (AUGO) is the stronger pick with 55.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aura Minerals (AUGO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Aura Minerals is actually cheaper at 7.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Aura Minerals (AUGO) delivered a total return of +254.

0%, compared to +77. 8% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAAS returned +335. 4% versus AUGO's +257. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Aura Minerals's 1. 96β — meaning AUGO is approximately 121% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 155% for Aura Minerals — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aura Minerals (AUGO) is pulling ahead at 55.

1% versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to -128. 6% for Aura Minerals. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAAS leads at 35. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -8. 6% for Aura Minerals — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUGO leads at 49. 2% versus 32. 3% for PAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUGO leads at 58. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Aura Minerals (AUGO) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Pan American Silver Corp. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAAS: 26. 8% to $75. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Aura Minerals (AUGO) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 8% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 0. 8% yield, +335. 4% 10Y return). Aura Minerals (AUGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +335. 4%, AUGO: +257. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.