Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AURE
Aurelion Inc.

Investment - Banking & Investment Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$68M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-57.0%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-69.8%
FTCI
FTC Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$68M
5Y Perf.-88.8%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-51.1%

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AURE logoAURE
ARRY logoARRY
SHLS logoSHLS
FTCI logoFTCI
CSIQ logoCSIQ
IndustryInvestment - Banking & Investment ServicesSolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$68M$1.25B$1.32B$68M$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$640K$1.21B$536M$96M$5.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-67M$34M$-41M$-104M
Gross Margin100.0%22.4%33.5%3.5%18.3%
Operating Margin-11.0%4.5%11.2%-36.3%0.1%
Forward P/E26.3x11.7x19.4x
Total Debt$181K$766M$175M$34M$7.68B
Cash & Equiv.$13K$244M$7M$21M$1.91B

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AURE
ARRY
SHLS
FTCI
CSIQ
StockJul 23May 26Return
Aurelion Inc. (AURE)1001.6-98.4%
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10043.0-57.0%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10030.2-69.8%
FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI)10011.2-88.8%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)10048.9-51.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SHLS leads in 2 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Aurelion Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. ARRY, FTCI, and CSIQ also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AURE
Aurelion Inc.
The Banking Pick

AURE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 5.9%, current ratio 1.12x
  • Beta 0.64 vs FTCI's 2.75
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Value Play

ARRY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • Beta 2.08, current ratio 2.03x
  • 6.3% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
  • 3.7% ROA vs AURE's -104.3%, ROIC 5.9% vs -108.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FTCI
FTC Solar, Inc.
The Growth Play

FTCI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 110.5%, EPS growth -43.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
  • 110.5% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
Best for: growth exposure
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CSIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 14.4% 10Y total return vs SHLS's -74.7%
  • +97.1% vs AURE's -45.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFTCI logoFTCI110.5% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
ValueARRY logoARRYBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSHLS logoSHLS6.3% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
Stability / SafetyAURE logoAUREBeta 0.64 vs FTCI's 2.75
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs AURE's -45.1%
Efficiency (ROA)SHLS logoSHLS3.7% ROA vs AURE's -104.3%, ROIC 5.9% vs -108.0%

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AUREAurelion Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
FTCIFTC Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
80.6%$80M
Service
19.4%$19M
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGFTCI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 8743.6x AURE's $639,912. SHLS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AURE's -10.7%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$639,912$1.2B$536M$96M$5.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$95M$73M-$34M$284M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$67M$34M-$41M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$58M-$77M-$39M-$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+22.4%+33.5%+3.5%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.0%+4.5%+11.2%-36.3%+0.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.7%-5.6%+6.3%-42.1%-1.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%+4.8%-14.5%-40.6%-29.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.1%+74.9%-17.0%-20.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.0%-24.1%-3.7%
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ARRY and CSIQ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Market CapShares × price$68M$1.3B$1.3B$68M$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$68M$1.8B$1.5B$81M$7.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.03x-11.23x39.20x-0.78x-11.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.33x11.75x19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.50x22.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue106.24x0.98x2.77x0.68x0.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x4.80x2.20x0.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.72x
Evenly matched — ARRY and CSIQ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SHLS delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-149 for AURE. AURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARRY scores 5/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-149.1%-20.6%+5.7%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-104.3%-4.4%+3.7%-40.1%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-108.0%+9.0%+5.9%-0.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-150.2%+8.2%+7.6%-86.6%-0.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945531
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x2.94x0.29x1.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$167,327$522M$168M$13M$5.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13,190$244M$7M$21M$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$180,517$766M$175M$34M$7.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.42x5.91x-13.63x0.02x
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CSIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSIQ five years ago would be worth $4,461 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for AURE. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs AURE's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSIQ at -21.9% vs AURE's -76.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.4%-15.3%-13.8%-65.1%-30.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.1%+62.7%+66.5%+43.3%+97.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-56.1%-60.2%-83.8%-52.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%-67.7%-72.8%-96.6%-55.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%-77.5%-74.7%-97.0%+14.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.8%-24.0%-26.5%-45.5%-21.9%
CSIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AURE and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTCI's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 69.0% from its 52-week high vs AURE's 16.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x2.32x2.08x2.75x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.60$12.23$11.36$12.75$34.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.25$4.92$3.81$2.90$8.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+16.2%+67.0%+69.0%+33.5%+51.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.456.463.242.262.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded103K6.0M5.1M189K2.5M
Evenly matched — AURE and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", FTCI as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 251.3% upside for FTCI (target: $15) vs 11.8% for ARRY (target: $9).

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FTCI logoFTCIFTC Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.17$9.83$15.00$28.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts28231233
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%+5.9%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SHLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CSIQ leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AURE vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FTCI vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FTC Solar, Inc.

(FTCI) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

Over the past 5 years, Canadian Solar Inc.

(CSIQ) delivered a total return of -55. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for Aurelion Inc. (AURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSIQ returned +14. 4% versus AURE's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus FTC Solar, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning FTCI is approximately 327% more volatile than AURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aurelion Inc. (AURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTC Solar, Inc.

(FTCI) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -538. 5% for Aurelion Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHLS leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -1074. 7% for Aurelion Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -1101. 2% for AURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AURE leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Aurelion Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTCI: 251. 3% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AURE or ARRY or SHLS or FTCI or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AURE: -98. 5%, FTCI: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AURE and ARRY and SHLS and FTCI and CSIQ?

These companies operate in different sectors (AURE (Financial Services) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and FTCI (Energy) and CSIQ (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AURE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AURE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 41%
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTCI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AURE and ARRY and SHLS and FTCI and CSIQ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AURE: 83.6% · ARRY: -26.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.