Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AURE
Aurelion Inc.

Investment - Banking & Investment Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$68M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-44.5%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+6.1%
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-55.0%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-65.9%

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AURE logoAURE
CSIQ logoCSIQ
FSLR logoFSLR
ARRY logoARRY
SHLS logoSHLS
IndustryInvestment - Banking & Investment ServicesSolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$68M$1.18B$23.06B$1.25B$1.32B
Revenue (TTM)$640K$5.60B$5.42B$1.21B$536M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-104M$1.67B$-67M$34M
Gross Margin100.0%18.3%41.7%22.4%33.5%
Operating Margin-11.0%0.1%33.0%4.5%11.2%
Forward P/E26.1x12.4x11.8x19.4x
Total Debt$181K$7.68B$499M$766M$175M
Cash & Equiv.$13K$1.91B$2.80B$244M$7M

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AURE
CSIQ
FSLR
ARRY
SHLS
StockJul 23May 26Return
Aurelion Inc. (AURE)1001.6-98.4%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)10055.5-44.5%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100106.1+6.1%
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10045.0-55.0%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10034.1-65.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AURE and FSLR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. First Solar, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CSIQ and ARRY also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AURE
Aurelion Inc.
The Banking Pick

AURE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64
  • 83.6% NII/revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
  • Beta 0.64 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +97.1% vs AURE's -45.1%
Best for: momentum
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FSLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs CSIQ's 14.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
  • 30.7% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
  • Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SHLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAURE logoAURE83.6% NII/revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
ValueARRY logoARRYLower P/E (11.8x vs 19.4x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
Stability / SafetyAURE logoAUREBeta 0.64 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs AURE's -45.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs AURE's -104.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs -108.0%

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AUREAurelion Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGARRY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 8743.6x AURE's $639,912. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AURE's -10.7%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$639,912$5.6B$5.4B$1.2B$536M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$284M$2.2B$95M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M$1.7B-$67M$34M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1.7B$1.7B$58M-$77M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+18.3%+41.7%+22.4%+33.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.0%+0.1%+33.0%+4.5%+11.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.7%-1.9%+30.7%-5.6%+6.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%-29.6%+30.8%+4.8%-14.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.0%+23.6%-26.1%+74.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%+65.1%-7.0%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CSIQ and ARRY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Market CapShares × price$68M$1.2B$23.1B$1.3B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$68M$7.0B$20.8B$1.8B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.03x-11.41x15.10x-11.23x39.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.11x12.39x11.83x19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.38x13.50x22.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue106.24x0.21x4.42x0.98x2.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x0.28x2.42x4.80x2.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.42x15.72x
Evenly matched — CSIQ and ARRY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-149 for AURE. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-149.1%-2.5%+18.0%-20.6%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-104.3%-0.7%+12.6%-4.4%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-108.0%-0.2%+17.6%+9.0%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-150.2%-0.3%+15.9%+8.2%+7.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–941755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x1.80x0.05x2.94x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$167,327$5.8B-$2.3B$522M$168M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13,190$1.9B$2.8B$244M$7M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$180,517$7.7B$499M$766M$175M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.02x53.51x-2.42x5.91x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for AURE. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs AURE's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs AURE's -76.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.4%-30.4%-21.8%-15.3%-13.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.1%+97.1%+65.3%+62.7%+66.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-52.3%+20.9%-56.1%-60.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%-55.4%+187.6%-67.7%-72.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%+14.4%+324.1%-77.5%-74.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.8%-21.9%+6.5%-24.0%-26.5%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AURE and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs AURE's 16.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x2.28x1.36x2.39x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.60$34.59$285.99$12.23$11.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.25$8.84$125.80$4.92$3.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+16.2%+51.1%+75.0%+67.0%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.462.464.356.463.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded103K2.5M2.1M6.0M5.1M
Evenly matched — AURE and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CSIQ as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.5% upside for CSIQ (target: $34) vs 17.4% for FSLR (target: $252).

MetricAURE logoAUREAurelion Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.50$251.82$9.67$9.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts33732823
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.9%+0.1%0.0%+0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is the stronger pick with 83. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -98. 6% for Aurelion Inc. (AURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus AURE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning ARRY is approximately 271% more volatile than AURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is pulling ahead at 83. 6% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -538. 5% for Aurelion Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -1074. 7% for Aurelion Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -1101. 2% for AURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AURE leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Aurelion Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 89. 5% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurelion Inc.

(AURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AURE: -98. 6%, ARRY: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AURE and CSIQ and FSLR and ARRY and SHLS?

These companies operate in different sectors (AURE (Financial Services) and CSIQ (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AURE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AURE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 41%
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AURE and CSIQ and FSLR and ARRY and SHLS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AURE: 83.6% · CSIQ: -20.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.