Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $68M | $1.18B | $23.06B | $1.25B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $640K | $5.60B | $5.42B | $1.21B | $536M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-104M | $1.67B | $-67M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 18.3% | 41.7% | 22.4% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 0.1% | 33.0% | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | — | 12.4x | 11.8x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $181K | $7.68B | $499M | $766M | $175M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13K | $1.91B | $2.80B | $244M | $7M |
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurelion Inc. (AURE) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AURE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64
- 83.6% NII/revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
- Beta 0.64 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
CSIQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +97.1% vs AURE's -45.1%
FSLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs CSIQ's 14.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, SHLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.6% NII/revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs AURE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.1% vs AURE's -45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs AURE's -104.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs -108.0% |
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 1 • AURE leads 0 • CSIQ leads 0 • ARRY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 8743.6x AURE's $639,912. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AURE's -10.7%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $639,912 | $5.6B | $5.4B | $1.2B | $536M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $284M | $2.2B | $95M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$104M | $1.7B | -$67M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1.7B | $1.7B | $58M | -$77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +18.3% | +41.7% | +22.4% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +0.1% | +33.0% | +4.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | -1.9% | +30.7% | -5.6% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -29.6% | +30.8% | +4.8% | -14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.0% | +23.6% | -26.1% | +74.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.7% | +65.1% | -7.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CSIQ and ARRY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $1.2B | $23.1B | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68M | $7.0B | $20.8B | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -11.41x | 15.10x | -11.23x | 39.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.11x | — | 12.39x | 11.83x | 19.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.49x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.38x | 13.50x | 22.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 106.24x | 0.21x | 4.42x | 0.98x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 0.28x | 2.42x | 4.80x | 2.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.42x | 15.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-149 for AURE. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -149.1% | -2.5% | +18.0% | -20.6% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.3% | -0.7% | +12.6% | -4.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | -0.2% | +17.6% | +9.0% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -150.2% | -0.3% | +15.9% | +8.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.80x | 0.05x | 2.94x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $167,327 | $5.8B | -$2.3B | $522M | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13,190 | $1.9B | $2.8B | $244M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180,517 | $7.7B | $499M | $766M | $175M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.02x | 53.51x | -2.42x | 5.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for AURE. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs AURE's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs AURE's -76.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.4% | -30.4% | -21.8% | -15.3% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.1% | +97.1% | +65.3% | +62.7% | +66.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -52.3% | +20.9% | -56.1% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -55.4% | +187.6% | -67.7% | -72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +14.4% | +324.1% | -77.5% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.8% | -21.9% | +6.5% | -24.0% | -26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AURE and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs AURE's 16.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 2.28x | 1.36x | 2.39x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.60 | $34.59 | $285.99 | $12.23 | $11.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $8.84 | $125.80 | $4.92 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.2% | +51.1% | +75.0% | +67.0% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 62.4 | 64.3 | 56.4 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 2.5M | 2.1M | 6.0M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSIQ as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.5% upside for CSIQ (target: $34) vs 17.4% for FSLR (target: $252).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $251.82 | $9.67 | $9.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 73 | 28 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.9% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AURE vs CSIQ vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the stronger pick with 83. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -98. 6% for Aurelion Inc. (AURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus AURE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning ARRY is approximately 271% more volatile than AURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is pulling ahead at 83. 6% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -538. 5% for Aurelion Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -1074. 7% for Aurelion Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -1101. 2% for AURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AURE leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Aurelion Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 89. 5% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AURE or CSIQ or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AURE: -98. 6%, ARRY: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AURE and CSIQ and FSLR and ARRY and SHLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (AURE (Financial Services) and CSIQ (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AURE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.