Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVIR vs COGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AVIR vs COGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $433M | $5.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-147M | $-354M |
| Total Debt | $843K | $253M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $96M | $312M |
AVIR vs COGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atea Pharmaceutical… (AVIR) | 100 | 17.9 | -82.1% |
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | 100 | 282.0 | +182.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVIR vs COGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVIR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.05
- EPS growth 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 7.82x
COGT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -21.7% 10Y total return vs AVIR's -81.7%
- +6.4% vs AVIR's +104.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs COGT's -33.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs COGT's 1.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.4% vs AVIR's +104.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.9% ROA vs COGT's -55.8%, ROIC -48.8% vs -66.4% |
AVIR vs COGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AVIR vs COGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COGT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVIR and COGT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$165M | -$362M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$147M | -$354M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$134M | -$286M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.2% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVIR and COGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $433M | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $338M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.86x | -13.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 3.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVIR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVIR delivers a -38.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-83 for COGT. AVIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COGT's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COGT scores 4/9 vs AVIR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.4% | -83.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.9% | -55.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.8% | -66.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.1% | -58.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $96M | $312M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $843,000 | $253M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -84.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COGT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COGT five years ago would be worth $41,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,599 for AVIR. Over the past 12 months, COGT leads with a +637.1% total return vs AVIR's +104.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COGT at 43.2% vs AVIR's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.2% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.4% | +637.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | +193.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +318.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.7% | -21.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AVIR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVIR is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COGT's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVIR currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs COGT's 79.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.44 | $43.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.46 | $4.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.0% | +79.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 437K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVIR as "Hold" and COGT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.5% upside for AVIR (target: $10) vs 39.4% for COGT (target: $49).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $48.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
COGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AVIR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
AVIR vs COGT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVIR or COGT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AVIR or COGT?
Over the past 5 years, Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) delivered a total return of +318. 7%, compared to -74. 0% for Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AVIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COGT returned -21. 8% versus AVIR's -82. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AVIR or COGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AVIR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Cogent Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning COGT is approximately 41% more volatile than AVIR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AVIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 40% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AVIR or COGT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AVIR or COGT?
Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AVIR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVIR leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for COGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVIR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AVIR or COGT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AVIR or COGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AVIR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVIR: -82. 1%, COGT: -21. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AVIR and COGT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.