Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVNT vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
AVNT vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.47B | $232.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.26B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $82M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.92B | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $511M | $5.06B |
AVNT vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVNT vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVNT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.8%
- Beta 1.19, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.66x
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 28.1x)
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 376.9% 10Y total return vs AVNT's 28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs AVNT's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 28.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs AVNT's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs AVNT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs AVNT's +9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs AVNT's 1.4%, ROIC 11.3% vs 3.9% |
AVNT vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVNT vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 10.6x AVNT's $3.3B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVNT's 2.5%. On growth, LIN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $395M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $82M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $195M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.4% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AVNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.4x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 19% valuation discount to AVNT's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVNT's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $232.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $254.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.52x | 34.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.39x | 28.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.54x | 20.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 6.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 5.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.80x | 45.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for AVNT. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVNT's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs AVNT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $511M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.10x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,041 for AVNT. Over the past 12 months, LIN leads with a +13.6% total return vs AVNT's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 12.4% vs AVNT's 1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.2% | +17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.8% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.8% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | +78.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | +376.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVNT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs AVNT's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.85 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.48 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 622K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
AVNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVNT as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.9% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs 7.5% for LIN (target: $540). For income investors, AVNT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs LIN's 1.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.40 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.08 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVNT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
AVNT vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVNT or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Avient Corporation (AVNT). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avient Corporation (AVNT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVNT or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 34.
4x versus Avient Corporation at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Avient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVNT or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.
1%, compared to -19. 6% for Avient Corporation (AVNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus AVNT's +28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVNT or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Avient Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning AVNT is approximately 397% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 81% for Avient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVNT or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus 0. 6% for Avient Corporation (AVNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -51. 6% for Avient Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVNT or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 2. 5% for Avient Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 6. 2% for AVNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVNT or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avient Corporation (AVNT) trades at 12.
4x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 27. 9% to $48. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVNT or LIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Avient Corporation (AVNT) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 2% for Linde plc (LIN).
09Is AVNT or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, AVNT: +28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVNT and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.