Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.23B | $3.34B | $67.18B | $3.37B | $5.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $444M | $685M | $3.67B | $660M | $5.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $201M | $136M | $-137M | $517M |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 83.1% | 79.9% | 78.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.6% | 33.7% | -0.7% | -21.9% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.7x | 12.9x | 88.0x | 242.2x | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $97M | $1.54B | $572M | $6.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $481M | $250M | $401M | $202M | $1.16B |
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| Open Text Corporati… (OTEX) | 100 | 57.0 | -43.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 193.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.53
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.41x
- 29.4% margin vs VRNS's -20.7%
DDOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 402.6% 10Y total return vs VRNS's 317.5%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs OTEX's -7.3%
- +78.0% vs AVPT's -40.0%
Among these 5 stocks, VRNS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OTEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.40 vs QLYS's 0.66
- Lower P/E (5.7x vs 242.2x)
- 4.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs OTEX's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 242.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs VRNS's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs DDOG's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.0% vs AVPT's -40.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 47.5% vs -11.0% |
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories
OTEX leads 1 • AVPT leads 1 • DDOG leads 1 • VRNS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OTEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 11.8x AVPT's $444M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNS's -20.7%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $444M | $685M | $3.7B | $660M | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $241M | $73M | -$135M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $201M | $136M | -$137M | $517M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $105M | $290M | $1.1B | $120M | $811M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.7% | +83.1% | +79.9% | +78.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +33.7% | -0.7% | -21.9% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +29.4% | +3.7% | -20.7% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +42.4% | +29.4% | +18.1% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +9.8% | +32.2% | +26.9% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +10.1% | +120.9% | 0.0% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OTEX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, OTEX trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QLYS offers better value at 0.90x vs OTEX's 1.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.3B | $67.2B | $3.4B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $3.2B | $68.3B | $3.7B | $11.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 68.80x | 17.45x | 629.10x | -25.38x | 14.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.75x | 12.87x | 87.97x | 242.23x | 5.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x | — | — | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 44.79x | 13.49x | 874.03x | — | 6.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.31x | 5.00x | 19.60x | 5.40x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.94x | 6.17x | 18.38x | 6.19x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.32x | 10.98x | 67.14x | 24.99x | 8.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. AVPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTEX's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVPT scores 6/9 vs VRNS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | +37.2% | +3.8% | -27.4% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +19.1% | +2.1% | -8.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +47.5% | -0.8% | -11.0% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +37.8% | -1.0% | -14.0% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.17x | 0.41x | 0.96x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$471M | -$153M | $1.1B | $369M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $481M | $250M | $401M | $202M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $97M | $1.5B | $572M | $6.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.03x | -9.01x | 3.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,970 for OTEX. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs AVPT's -40.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs OTEX's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.9% | -27.5% | +41.1% | -10.5% | -24.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.0% | -25.6% | +78.0% | -36.7% | -7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.0% | -17.7% | +140.3% | +23.7% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -3.1% | +144.2% | -39.9% | -40.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +267.2% | +402.6% | +317.5% | +16.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | -6.3% | +33.9% | +7.3% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QLYS and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDOG's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.53x | 1.40x | 0.95x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.25 | $155.47 | $201.69 | $63.90 | $39.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.83 | $74.51 | $98.01 | $19.70 | $20.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.0% | +61.1% | +93.6% | +44.9% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 54.2 | 66.5 | 66.1 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 773K | 5.0M | 2.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVPT as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold", DDOG as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", OTEX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.6% upside for AVPT (target: $18) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175). OTEX is the only dividend payer here at 4.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $134.30 | $174.63 | $36.00 | $30.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 48 | 47 | 34 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +5.5% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +9.2% |
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OTEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AVPT vs QLYS vs DDOG vs VRNS vs OTEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Open Text Corporation (OTEX). Open Text Corporation (OTEX) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
On trailing P/E, Open Text Corporation (OTEX) is the cheapest at 14.
4x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Open Text Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Open Text Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Qualys, Inc. 's 0. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -40. 3% for Open Text Corporation (OTEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DDOG returned +402. 6% versus AVPT's +5. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Datadog, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning DDOG is approximately 164% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 169% for Open Text Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus -7. 3% for Open Text Corporation (OTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AvePoint, Inc. grew EPS 193. 8% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -20. 7% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Open Text Corporation (OTEX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Qualys, Inc. 's 0. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Open Text Corporation (OTEX) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 236. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVPT: 69. 6% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX?
In this comparison, OTEX (4.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AVPT, QLYS, DDOG, VRNS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVPT or QLYS or DDOG or VRNS or OTEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, DDOG: +402. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVPT and QLYS and DDOG and VRNS and OTEX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OTEX is a small-cap deep-value stock. OTEX pays a dividend while AVPT, QLYS, DDOG, VRNS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.