Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVTR vs TMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
AVTR vs TMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $5.76B | $175.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.55B | $45.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-551M | $6.86B |
| Gross Margin | 32.1% | 39.4% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.95B | $40.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $365M | $9.86B |
AVTR vs TMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
| Thermo Fisher Scien… (TMO) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVTR vs TMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVTR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 19.0x)
TMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 3.9%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.3%
- 229.1% 10Y total return vs AVTR's -41.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.9% revenue growth vs AVTR's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs AVTR's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs AVTR's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.6% vs AVTR's -29.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs AVTR's -4.6%, ROIC 7.5% vs -2.0% |
AVTR vs TMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVTR vs TMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 6.9x AVTR's $6.6B. TMO is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVTR's -8.4%. On growth, TMO holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$551M | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $439M | $6.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | +39.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | +11.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AVTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TMO's 19.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVTR's 56.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $175.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $206.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.81x | 26.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.73x | 19.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 56.93x | 18.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 3.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 3.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.63x | 27.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMO delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-10 for AVTR. AVTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMO's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMO scores 6/9 vs AVTR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.6% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $31.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $365M | $9.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $40.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.55x | 5.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMO five years ago would be worth $10,211 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,718 for AVTR. Over the past 12 months, TMO leads with a +16.6% total return vs AVTR's -29.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMO at -4.2% vs AVTR's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | -20.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.6% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.0% | -11.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.8% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | +229.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.1% | -4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVTR's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMO currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs AVTR's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.93 | $643.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.26 | $385.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
TMO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVTR as "Hold" and TMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for TMO (target: $655) vs 12.7% for AVTR (target: $10). TMO is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $654.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.7% |
TMO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVTR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AVTR vs TMO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVTR or TMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the stronger pick with 3. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVTR or TMO?
On forward P/E, Avantor, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVTR or TMO?
Over the past 5 years, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) delivered a total return of +2. 1%, compared to -72. 8% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMO returned +229. 1% versus AVTR's -41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVTR or TMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Avantor, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning AVTR is approximately 41% more volatile than TMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 76% for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVTR or TMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is pulling ahead at 3. 9% versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Avantor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMO leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVTR or TMO?
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 1% net margin versus -8. 1% for Avantor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMO leads at 18. 2% versus -3. 8% for AVTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMO leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVTR or TMO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avantor, Inc.
(AVTR) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMO: 38. 4% to $654. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVTR or TMO?
In this comparison, TMO (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AVTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVTR or TMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +229. 1% 10Y return). Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMO: +229. 1%, AVTR: -41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVTR and TMO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.