Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVTR vs WAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
AVTR vs WAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $5.67B | $22.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.55B | $3.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-551M | $449M |
| Gross Margin | 32.1% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.95B | $1.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $365M | $588M |
AVTR vs WAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
| Waters Corporation (WAT) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVTR vs WAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVTR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 24.4x)
WAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 0.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 162.0% 10Y total return vs AVTR's -42.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs AVTR's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 24.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs AVTR's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs AVTR's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.4% vs AVTR's -30.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs AVTR's -4.6%, ROIC 20.3% vs -2.0% |
AVTR vs WAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVTR vs WAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 1.7x WAT's $3.8B. WAT is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVTR's -8.4%. On growth, WAT holds the edge at +91.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $953M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$551M | $449M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $439M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +91.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | -142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AVTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WAT's 21.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVTR's 56.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $22.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.65x | 32.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.57x | 24.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 56.43x | 21.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 7.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 8.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.46x | 42.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WAT delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for AVTR. WAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVTR's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVTR scores 5/9 vs WAT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.6% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $365M | $588M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.55x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAT five years ago would be worth $11,133 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,662 for AVTR. Over the past 12 months, WAT leads with a +1.4% total return vs AVTR's -30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAT at 5.7% vs AVTR's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.5% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.4% | +1.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | +11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | +162.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVTR's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAT currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs AVTR's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.93 | $414.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.26 | $275.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.2% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.9M | 999K |
Analyst Outlook
WAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVTR as "Hold" and WAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.9% upside for WAT (target: $403) vs 14.3% for AVTR (target: $10).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $402.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.1% |
WAT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVTR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AVTR vs WAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVTR or WAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Waters Corporation (WAT) is the stronger pick with 7.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Waters Corporation (WAT) offers the better valuation at 32. 6x trailing P/E (24. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVTR or WAT?
On forward P/E, Avantor, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVTR or WAT?
Over the past 5 years, Waters Corporation (WAT) delivered a total return of +11.
3%, compared to -73. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAT returned +162. 0% versus AVTR's -42. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVTR or WAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waters Corporation (WAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Avantor, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning AVTR is approximately 44% more volatile than WAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Waters Corporation (WAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 71% for Avantor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVTR or WAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Waters Corporation (WAT) is pulling ahead at 7.
0% versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waters Corporation grew EPS 0. 5% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Avantor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAT leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVTR or WAT?
Waters Corporation (WAT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -8. 1% for Avantor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAT leads at 28. 2% versus -3. 8% for AVTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WAT leads at 57. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVTR or WAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avantor, Inc.
(AVTR) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Waters Corporation — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAT: 14. 9% to $402. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVTR or WAT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AVTR or WAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Waters Corporation (WAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), +162. 0% 10Y return). Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAT: +162. 0%, AVTR: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVTR and WAT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.