Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AXGN
AxoGen, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.+333.6%
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$548M
5Y Perf.+0.3%
TELA
TELA Bio, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$44M
5Y Perf.-92.6%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-73.5%
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.97B
5Y Perf.+42.6%

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AXGN logoAXGN
MDXG logoMDXG
TELA logoTELA
NVCR logoNVCR
HOLX logoHOLX
IndustryMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$2.24B$548M$44M$1.92B$16.97B
Revenue (TTM)$238M$389M$77M$674M$4.13B
Net Income (TTM)$-31M$31M$-39M$-173M$544M
Gross Margin75.0%81.0%67.2%75.2%52.8%
Operating Margin-3.8%10.2%-46.0%-27.2%17.5%
Forward P/E86.5x288.0x17.2x
Total Debt$19M$23M$43M$290M$2.63B
Cash & Equiv.$36M$166M$53M$103M$1.96B

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AXGN
MDXG
TELA
NVCR
HOLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN)100433.6+333.6%
MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)100100.3+0.3%
TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA)1007.4-92.6%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10026.5-73.5%
Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)100142.6+42.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AxoGen, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. MDXG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AXGN
AxoGen, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AXGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 14.9%, current ratio 5.11x
  • 20.2% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
  • +164.9% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
The Niche Pick

MDXG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 9.7% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 42.3% vs -151.6%
Best for: efficiency
TELA
TELA Bio, Inc.
The Growth Play

TELA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 34.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
  • Beta 0.57, current ratio 5.01x
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
The Income Pick

HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 0.41
  • Better valuation composite
  • 13.2% margin vs TELA's -50.6%
  • Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAXGN logoAXGN20.2% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
ValueHOLX logoHOLXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHOLX logoHOLX13.2% margin vs TELA's -50.6%
Stability / SafetyHOLX logoHOLXBeta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AXGN logoAXGN+164.9% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MDXG logoMDXG9.7% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 42.3% vs -151.6%

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AXGNAxoGen, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Surgical
100.0%$142M
TELATELA Bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

HOLXHologic, Inc.
FY 2025
Diagnostics
44.6%$1.8B
Breast Health
36.2%$1.5B
Gyn Surgical
16.6%$680M
Skeletal Health
2.7%$109M

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAXGNLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 53.6x TELA's $77M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TELA's -50.6%. On growth, AXGN holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$238M$389M$77M$674M$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$53M-$34M-$165M$974M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$31M$31M-$39M-$173M$544M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$66M-$32M-$48M$1000M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.0%+81.0%+67.2%+75.2%+52.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.8%+10.2%-46.0%-27.2%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.2%+7.9%-50.6%-25.7%+13.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.8%+17.0%-40.9%-7.1%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.6%-33.1%+9.1%+12.3%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.5%-2.4%+54.8%-100.0%-9.2%
HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MDXG and TELA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXGN's 6463.0x.

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$548M$44M$1.9B$17.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.2B$405M$35M$2.1B$17.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-127.68x11.53x-0.83x-13.80x30.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.86.49x288.00x17.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6463.03x5.14x17.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.94x1.31x0.64x2.92x4.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share15.51x2.15x1.10x5.51x3.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.51x18.44x
Evenly matched — MDXG and TELA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TELA. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TELA's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs TELA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.7%+12.9%-2.7%-50.8%+11.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.5%+9.7%-53.1%-16.5%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.6%+42.3%-151.6%-16.4%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.2%+25.7%-51.4%-28.9%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955457
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.15x0.09x1.51x0.85x0.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M-$144M-$10M$187M$667M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$166M$53M$103M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19M$23M$43M$290M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.05x25.32x-6.99x-96.80x8.00x
MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AXGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AXGN five years ago would be worth $18,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $853 for TELA. Over the past 12 months, AXGN leads with a +164.9% total return vs MDXG's -47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXGN at 65.0% vs TELA's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+40.0%-43.1%-3.5%+28.3%+1.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+164.9%-47.1%+15.8%+1.1%+37.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+349.4%-36.6%-88.9%-75.7%-8.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.7%-62.9%-91.5%-91.3%+15.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+647.2%-48.5%-91.8%+30.3%+124.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+65.0%-14.1%-51.9%-37.6%-2.9%
AXGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TELA and HOLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MDXG's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x1.21x0.33x2.15x0.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.75$7.99$2.20$20.06$76.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.22$3.02$0.50$9.82$52.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.9%+46.2%+50.0%+83.9%+100.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.449.362.769.869.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded968K1.4M188K1.5M10.0M
Evenly matched — TELA and HOLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AXGN as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 0.0% for AXGN (target: $43).

MetricAXGN logoAXGNAxoGen, Inc.MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.TELA logoTELATELA Bio, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.43$10.00$33.50$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts19151542
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.6%0.0%0.0%+4.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HOLX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MDXG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallAxoGen, Inc. (AXGN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AXGN vs MDXG vs TELA vs NVCR vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AxoGen, Inc.

(AXGN) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (288. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Hologic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

Over the past 5 years, AxoGen, Inc.

(AXGN) delivered a total return of +84. 7%, compared to -91. 5% for TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXGN returned +623. 9% versus TELA's -92. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TELA Bio, Inc.

(TELA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 548% more volatile than TELA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 151% for TELA Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AxoGen, Inc.

(AXGN) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TELA Bio, Inc. grew EPS 34. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for AxoGen, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TELA leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -54. 6% for TELA Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOLX leads at 17. 4% versus -49. 2% for TELA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 288. 0x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 270. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AXGN or MDXG or TELA or NVCR or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), +124. 3% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AXGN and MDXG and TELA and NVCR and HOLX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AXGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; TELA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AXGN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TELA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AXGN and MDXG and TELA and NVCR and HOLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AXGN: 26.6% · MDXG: -33.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.