Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AXIA vs TGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
AXIA vs TGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $26.49B | $2.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40.57B | $1.65T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.72B | $406.73B |
| Gross Margin | 42.2% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | 41.3% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $77.26B | $1.67T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16.42B | $803.80B |
Quick Verdict: AXIA vs TGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXIA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.3%
- 9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TGS's 4.2%
- +21.7% vs TGS's +20.0%
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs AXIA's -92.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs AXIA's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 2.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs AXIA's 16.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs AXIA's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TGS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs TGS's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs AXIA's 2.4%, ROIC 19.3% vs 4.1% |
AXIA vs TGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 40.7x AXIA's $40.6B. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXIA's 16.6%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40.6B | $1.65T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.9B | $885.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.7B | $406.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.9B | $224.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +41.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.3% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, TGS trades at a 49% valuation discount to AXIA's 25.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGS's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXIA's 13.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.5B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38.8B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.69x | 13.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.84x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.48x | 3.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.18x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.68x | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for AXIA. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXIA's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs AXIA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60.8B | $868.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16.4B | $803.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77.3B | $1.67T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.16x | 8.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,848 for AXIA. Over the past 12 months, AXIA leads with a +21.7% total return vs TGS's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs AXIA's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | +20.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +165.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | +598.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +449.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.8% | +38.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AXIA and TGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXIA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.54 | $36.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.06 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 344K |
Analyst Outlook
AXIA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXIA as "Buy" and TGS as "Buy". For income investors, AXIA offers the higher dividend yield at 9.29% vs TGS's 4.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.42 | $1788.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
TGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AXIA leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AXIA vs TGS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXIA or TGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for AXIA Energia S. A. (AXIA). Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIA Energia S. A. (AXIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXIA or TGS?
On trailing P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus AXIA Energia S. A. at 25. 7x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXIA or TGS?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +28. 5% for AXIA Energia S. A. (AXIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus AXIA's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXIA or TGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus AXIA Energia S. A. 's 1. 21β — meaning AXIA is approximately 34% more volatile than TGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 65% for AXIA Energia S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXIA or TGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus -10. 4% for AXIA Energia S. A. (AXIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 6% for AXIA Energia S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGS leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXIA or TGS?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 15. 9% for AXIA Energia S. A. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 23. 4% for AXIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXIA or TGS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 2. 8x for AXIA Energia S. A. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXIA or TGS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AXIA Energia S. A. (AXIA) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 4. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS).
09Is AXIA or TGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 2% yield, +449. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGS: +449. 2%, AXIA: -92. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXIA and TGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (AXIA (Utilities) and TGS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AXIA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.