Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AXL vs LEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
AXL vs LEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $761M | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.84B | $23.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $528M |
| Gross Margin | 12.1% | 5.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $135M | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $709M | $1.03B |
AXL vs LEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Axle & Man… (AXL) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
| Lear Corporation (LEA) | 100 | 123.8 | +23.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXL vs LEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.84
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.95x
LEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 38.9% 10Y total return vs AXL's -59.5%
- Beta 1.14, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.35x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs AXL's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.2% margin vs AXL's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs AXL's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs AXL's +55.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs AXL's -0.3%, ROIC 9.7% vs 6.0% |
AXL vs LEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AXL vs LEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEA is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.5B annually — 4.0x AXL's $5.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.2% (LEA) to -0.3% (AXL). On growth, LEA holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $23.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $454M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $528M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $155M | $732M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +5.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +124.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AXL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AXL's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LEA's 6.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $761M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $187M | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.71x | 16.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.63x | 9.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.67x | 6.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.91x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEA delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXL. AXL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEA's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEA scores 7/9 vs AXL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$574M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $709M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.83x | 7.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LEA five years ago would be worth $7,682 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,116 for AXL. Over the past 12 months, LEA leads with a +61.3% total return vs AXL's +55.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LEA at 4.3% vs AXL's -4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.2% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.2% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.0% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.8% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | +38.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.2% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
LEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEA is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXL's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEA currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs AXL's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $142.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $85.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.3% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 558K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXL as "Hold" and LEA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 65.8% upside for AXL (target: $11) vs -6.4% for LEA (target: $127). LEA is the only dividend payer here at 2.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.63 | $126.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% |
LEA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AXL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AXL vs LEA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXL or LEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lear Corporation (LEA) is the stronger pick with -0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL). Lear Corporation (LEA) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXL or LEA?
On forward P/E, Lear Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXL or LEA?
Over the past 5 years, Lear Corporation (LEA) delivered a total return of -23.
2%, compared to -38. 8% for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LEA returned +38. 9% versus AXL's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXL or LEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lear Corporation (LEA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning AXL is approximately 62% more volatile than LEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 79% for Lear Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXL or LEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lear Corporation (LEA) is pulling ahead at -0.
2% versus -4. 7% for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lear Corporation grew EPS -9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -158. 6% for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEA leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXL or LEA?
Lear Corporation (LEA) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
9% net margin versus -0. 3% for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEA leads at 4. 4% versus 1. 9% for AXL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXL leads at 12. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXL or LEA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lear Corporation (LEA) trades at 9.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AXL: 65. 8% to $10. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXL or LEA?
In this comparison, LEA (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AXL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXL or LEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lear Corporation (LEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), 2. 3% yield). American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AXL) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEA: +38. 9%, AXL: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXL and LEA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. LEA pays a dividend while AXL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.