Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AXS vs PRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
AXS vs PRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $7.33B | $242M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.61B | $69M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $-47M |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | -62.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $820M | $32M |
AXS vs PRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIS Capital Holdin… (AXS) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
| Prenetics Global Li… (PRE) | 100 | 14.2 | -85.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXS vs PRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
- 113.6% 10Y total return vs PRE's -86.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 23.5%, current ratio 1.58x
PRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 201.7%, EPS growth -14.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.5%
- 201.7% revenue growth vs AXS's 9.1%
- +204.0% vs AXS's +1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 201.7% revenue growth vs AXS's 9.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.2% margin vs PRE's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs PRE's 0.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +204.0% vs AXS's +1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs PRE's -23.7%, ROIC 14.8% vs -20.8% |
AXS vs PRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AXS vs PRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 95.8x PRE's $69M. AXS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRE's -67.4%. On growth, PRE holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $69M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $169M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | -62.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | -67.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.6% | +36.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AXS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $242M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $213M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.05x | -3.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.47x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.12x | 2.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AXS delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-29 for PRE. PRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXS's 0.23x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | -28.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -23.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | -20.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | -21.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $673M | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $820M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.21x | -199.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXS five years ago would be worth $18,859 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,395 for PRE. Over the past 12 months, PRE leads with a +204.0% total return vs AXS's +1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXS at 23.9% vs PRE's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.3% | +204.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.1% | +24.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -86.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.6% | -86.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | +7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AXS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRE's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXS currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs PRE's 67.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.34 | $23.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.07 | $5.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +67.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 509K | 183K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXS as "Buy" and PRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 126.4% upside for PRE (target: $36) vs 24.7% for AXS (target: $124). AXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $123.88 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.1% | 0.0% |
AXS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
AXS vs PRE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXS or PRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Prenetics Global Limited (PRE) is the stronger pick with 201.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AXS or PRE?
Over the past 5 years, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) delivered a total return of +88.
6%, compared to -86. 0% for Prenetics Global Limited (PRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXS returned +113. 6% versus PRE's -86. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AXS or PRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Prenetics Global Limited's 0. 27β — meaning PRE is approximately 126% more volatile than AXS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prenetics Global Limited (PRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AXS or PRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Prenetics Global Limited (PRE) is pulling ahead at 201.
7% versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AXIS Capital Holdings Limited grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 0% for Prenetics Global Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRE leads at 91. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AXS or PRE?
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus -63. 1% for Prenetics Global Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXS leads at 18. 7% versus -40. 5% for PRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRE leads at 53. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AXS or PRE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRE: 126.
4% to $36. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AXS or PRE?
In this comparison, AXS (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AXS or PRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 1. 8% yield, +113. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXS: +113. 6%, PRE: -86. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AXS and PRE?
These companies operate in different sectors (AXS (Financial Services) and PRE (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRE is a small-cap high-growth stock. AXS pays a dividend while PRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.