AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$7.28B
5Y Perf.+163.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AXS vs RNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
Insurance - Reinsurance
Market Cap$13.03B
5Y Perf.+79.9%
AXS vs RNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AXS | RNR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $7.28B | $13.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.61B | $11.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $3.09B |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 35.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $2.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $820M | $1.73B |
AXS vs RNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AXS
RNR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIS Capital Holdin… (AXS) | 100 | 263.2 | +163.2% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.9 | +79.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXS vs RNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RNR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AXIS Capital Holdings Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
The Insurance Pick
AXS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
- Beta 0.12, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
The Insurance Pick
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.2%
- 182.6% 10Y total return vs AXS's 113.8%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.03, Low D/E 12.1%, current ratio 5.03x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RNR | 9.4% revenue growth vs AXS's 9.1% |
| Value | AXS | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | RNR | Combined ratio 0.7 vs AXS's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) |
| Stability / Safety | RNR | Lower D/E ratio (12.1% vs 23.5%) |
| Dividends | AXS | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RNR's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | RNR | +23.0% vs AXS's +1.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RNR | 5.7% ROA vs AXS's 3.1%, ROIC 16.0% vs 14.8% |
AXS vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
AXS vs RNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRNRLAGGINGAXS
AXSAXIS Capital Holdings…
1leads
RNRRenaissanceRe Holding…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AXSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RNR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RNR4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RNR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
RNR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AXS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 1.7x AXS's $6.6B. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXS's 16.2%. On growth, AXS holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $169M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +35.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | -36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.6% | +100.9% |
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 33% valuation discount to AXS's 8.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RNR's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXS's 6.2x.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.00x | 5.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.43x | 7.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.21x | 3.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.53x |
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AXS delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $17 for RNR. RNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs AXS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | +16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $673M | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $820M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.21x | 33.28x |
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AXS and RNR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXS five years ago would be worth $18,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,659 for RNR. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +23.0% total return vs AXS's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXS at 24.0% vs RNR's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.0% | +23.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.6% | +48.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.7% | +86.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.8% | +182.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.0% | +14.1% |
Evenly matched — AXS and RNR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXS's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs AXS's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.34 | $318.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.07 | $231.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 510K | 311K |
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AXS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXS as "Buy" and RNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for AXS (target: $124) vs 2.1% for RNR (target: $308). For income investors, AXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.82% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | AXSAXIS Capital Hold… | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $123.88 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.2% | +12.3% |
AXS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
RNR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AXS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AXS vs RNR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXS or RNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXS or RNR?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus AXIS Capital Holdings Limited at 8. 0x. On forward P/E, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXS or RNR?
Over the past 5 years, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) delivered a total return of +86.
7%, compared to +86. 6% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNR returned +182. 6% versus AXS's +113. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXS or RNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus AXIS Capital Holdings Limited's 0. 12β — meaning AXS is approximately -472% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 23% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXS or RNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 9. 1% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXS or RNR?
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 15. 4% for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 18. 7% for AXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXS leads at 49. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXS or RNR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AXS: 25. 4% to $123. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXS or RNR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 6% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR).
09Is AXS or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +182. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +182. 6%, AXS: +113. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXS and RNR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AXS: 12.0% · RNR: -36.4%)Net Margin>
%
(AXS: 16.2% · RNR: 26.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AXS: 8.0x · RNR: 5.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.