Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.76B | $25.84B | $63.74B | $2.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $1.07B | $2.49B | $481M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $177M | $440M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 12.7% | 55.3% | 37.7% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | -24.9% | 16.0% | 9.5% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3831.1x | 76.9x | 114.4x | 89.2x |
| Total Debt | $66M | $538M | $2.61B | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $112M | $521M | $227M |
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXT, Inc. (AXTI) | 100 | 2049.5 | +1949.5% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +83.7% vs COHU's +199.7%
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.75
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 3.71x
- 32.6% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1%
- Lower P/E (76.9x vs 89.2x)
LITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs AXTI's 33.6%
- 17.7% margin vs AXTI's -24.1%
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (76.9x vs 89.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs AXTI's -24.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.75 vs AXTI's 4.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.7% vs COHU's +199.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs AXTI's -5.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -6.0% |
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
AXTI leads 2 • LITE leads 1 • COHU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 28.2x AXTI's $88M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXTI's -24.1%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $1.1B | $2.5B | $481M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $210M | $425M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $177M | $440M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $168M | $399M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +55.3% | +37.7% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +16.0% | +9.5% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.1% | +16.5% | +17.7% | -11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | +15.6% | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +22.5% | +90.1% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | +42.9% | +3.3% | +60.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MTSI's 136.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $25.8B | $63.7B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $26.3B | $65.8B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -221.27x | -471.88x | 2412.94x | -29.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3831.10x | 76.91x | 114.43x | 89.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 136.13x | 859.43x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 53.94x | 26.71x | 38.75x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.23x | 19.20x | 54.76x | 2.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 134.01x | — | 207.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AXTI. AXTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs AXTI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | +13.2% | +30.7% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +8.6% | +8.5% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | +6.0% | -4.3% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | +7.6% | -4.8% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.41x | 2.30x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$63M | $426M | $2.1B | $132M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $112M | $521M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $66M | $538M | $2.6B | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.48x | 391.47x | 9.62x | -168.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXTI five years ago would be worth $112,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, AXTI leads with a +8370.3% total return vs COHU's +199.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXTI at 2.3% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +546.9% | +96.9% | +131.2% | +92.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8370.3% | +203.8% | +1247.8% | +199.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3420.1% | +526.9% | +1764.2% | +40.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1022.4% | +513.6% | +976.6% | +22.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3363.9% | +795.9% | +3635.5% | +330.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +84.4% | +165.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AXTI and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXTI's 4.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXTI currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs LITE's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.18x | 1.75x | 2.69x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.80 | $355.00 | $1021.00 | $50.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $110.09 | $60.38 | $15.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +97.0% | +87.4% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.9 | 71.3 | 58.8 | 75.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.3M | 1.1M | 6.4M | 953K |
Analyst Outlook
AXTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AXTI as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -51.7% for AXTI (target: $52).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.40 | $254.00 | $643.18 | $49.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 23 | 24 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.3% |
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AXTI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) offers the better valuation at 2412. 9x trailing P/E (114. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXT, Inc. (AXTI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
On forward P/E, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 76. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
Over the past 5 years, AXT, Inc.
(AXTI) delivered a total return of +1022%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 75β versus AXT, Inc. 's 4. 18β — meaning AXTI is approximately 139% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -24. 1% for AXT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -24. 9% for AXTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) trades at 76. 9x forward P/E versus 3831. 1x for AXT, Inc. — 3754. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+795. 9% 10Y return). AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a higher beta of 4. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTSI: +795. 9%, AXTI: +33. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXTI and MTSI and LITE and COHU?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AXTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.