Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AXTI
AXT, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.76B
5Y Perf.+1949.5%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$25.84B
5Y Perf.+984.9%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.74B
5Y Perf.+1117.7%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AXTI logoAXTI
MTSI logoMTSI
LITE logoLITE
COHU logoCOHU
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentSemiconductors
Market Cap$4.76B$25.84B$63.74B$2.23B
Revenue (TTM)$88M$1.07B$2.49B$481M
Net Income (TTM)$-21M$177M$440M$-56M
Gross Margin12.7%55.3%37.7%25.7%
Operating Margin-24.9%16.0%9.5%-10.6%
Forward P/E3831.1x76.9x114.4x89.2x
Total Debt$66M$538M$2.61B$359M
Cash & Equiv.$128M$112M$521M$227M

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AXTI
MTSI
LITE
COHU
StockMay 20May 26Return
AXT, Inc. (AXTI)1002049.5+1949.5%
MACOM Technology So… (MTSI)1001084.9+984.9%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001217.7+1117.7%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100315.3+215.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MTSI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. AXT, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LITE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AXTI
AXT, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

AXTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +83.7% vs COHU's +199.7%
Best for: momentum
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.75
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 3.71x
  • 32.6% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1%
  • Lower P/E (76.9x vs 89.2x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

LITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
  • 36.4% 10Y total return vs AXTI's 33.6%
  • 17.7% margin vs AXTI's -24.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMTSI logoMTSI32.6% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1%
ValueMTSI logoMTSILower P/E (76.9x vs 89.2x)
Quality / MarginsLITE logoLITE17.7% margin vs AXTI's -24.1%
Stability / SafetyMTSI logoMTSIBeta 1.75 vs AXTI's 4.18
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AXTI logoAXTI+83.7% vs COHU's +199.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MTSI logoMTSI8.6% ROA vs AXTI's -5.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -6.0%

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AXTIAXT, Inc.
FY 2025
Substrates
66.7%$59M
Raw Materials and Other
33.3%$29M
MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAXTILAGGINGCOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 28.2x AXTI's $88M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXTI's -24.1%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$88M$1.1B$2.5B$481M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$13M$210M$425M-$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$21M$177M$440M-$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$168M$399M$32M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.7%+55.3%+37.7%+25.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-24.9%+16.0%+9.5%-10.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-24.1%+16.5%+17.7%-11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.3%+15.6%+16.0%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.2%+22.5%+90.1%+29.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.0%+42.9%+3.3%+60.6%
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MTSI's 136.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.8B$25.8B$63.7B$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.7B$26.3B$65.8B$2.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-221.27x-471.88x2412.94x-29.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3831.10x76.91x114.43x89.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple136.13x859.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue53.94x26.71x38.75x4.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.23x19.20x54.76x2.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF134.01x207.83x
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AXTI. AXTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs AXTI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.0%+13.2%+30.7%-6.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.9%+8.6%+8.5%-4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.0%+6.0%-4.3%-5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.2%+7.6%-4.8%-5.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.41x2.30x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$63M$426M$2.1B$132M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$128M$112M$521M$227M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$66M$538M$2.6B$359M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-17.48x391.47x9.62x-168.82x
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AXTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AXTI five years ago would be worth $112,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, AXTI leads with a +8370.3% total return vs COHU's +199.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXTI at 2.3% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+546.9%+96.9%+131.2%+92.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8370.3%+203.8%+1247.8%+199.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3420.1%+526.9%+1764.2%+40.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1022.4%+513.6%+976.6%+22.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3363.9%+795.9%+3635.5%+330.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.3%+84.4%+165.2%+12.1%
AXTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AXTI and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXTI's 4.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXTI currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs LITE's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.18x1.75x2.69x2.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$110.80$355.00$1021.00$50.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.23$110.09$60.38$15.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.9%+97.0%+87.4%+93.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.971.358.875.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12.3M1.1M6.4M953K
Evenly matched — AXTI and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AXTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AXTI as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -51.7% for AXTI (target: $52).

MetricAXTI logoAXTIAXT, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$52.40$254.00$643.18$49.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts11232414
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+0.1%+0.3%
AXTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AXTI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAXT, Inc. (AXTI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AXTI vs MTSI vs LITE vs COHU: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) offers the better valuation at 2412. 9x trailing P/E (114. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXT, Inc. (AXTI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

On forward P/E, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 76. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

Over the past 5 years, AXT, Inc.

(AXTI) delivered a total return of +1022%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 75β versus AXT, Inc. 's 4. 18β — meaning AXTI is approximately 139% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -24. 1% for AXT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -24. 9% for AXTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) trades at 76. 9x forward P/E versus 3831. 1x for AXT, Inc. — 3754. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AXTI or MTSI or LITE or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+795. 9% 10Y return). AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a higher beta of 4. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTSI: +795. 9%, AXTI: +33. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AXTI and MTSI and LITE and COHU?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AXTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AXTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AXTI and MTSI and LITE and COHU on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AXTI: -8.2% · MTSI: 22.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.