Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AZTA vs CCSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
AZTA vs CCSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $855M | $520M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $597M | $351M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $88M |
| Gross Margin | 44.6% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 42.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 5.0x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $580M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $280M | $75M |
AZTA vs CCSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZTA vs CCSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AZTA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 60.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 123.4% 10Y total return vs CCSI's -20.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 2.98x
CCSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.79x
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 23.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs CCSI's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs AZTA's -29.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs AZTA's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs AZTA's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs AZTA's -8.8%, ROIC 22.2% vs -0.5% |
AZTA vs CCSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AZTA vs CCSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AZTA is the larger business by revenue, generating $597M annually — 1.7x CCSI's $351M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AZTA's -29.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $597M | $351M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | $88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.6% | +80.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +42.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.9% | +25.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +21.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AZTA and CCSI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AZTA's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $855M | $520M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $687M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.22x | 6.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.68x | 4.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 6.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 39.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.32x | 4.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AZTA and CCSI each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AZTA. AZTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AZTA scores 6/9 vs CCSI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | +52.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.8% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +26.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 42.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$169M | $506M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $280M | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $580M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCSI five years ago would be worth $7,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,903 for AZTA. Over the past 12 months, CCSI leads with a +26.8% total return vs AZTA's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCSI at -7.9% vs AZTA's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.4% | +30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.5% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -21.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | -20.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | -7.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CCSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AZTA's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCSI currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs AZTA's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.73 | $31.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.11 | $19.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.5% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 123K |
Analyst Outlook
CCSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AZTA as "Buy" and CCSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.5% upside for AZTA (target: $45) vs -11.6% for CCSI (target: $25).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.67 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% |
CCSI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
AZTA vs CCSI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZTA or CCSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Azenta, Inc.
(AZTA) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AZTA or CCSI?
On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AZTA or CCSI?
Over the past 5 years, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) delivered a total return of -20. 6%, compared to -81. 0% for Azenta, Inc. (AZTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AZTA returned +123. 4% versus CCSI's -20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AZTA or CCSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Azenta, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning AZTA is approximately 44% more volatile than CCSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AZTA or CCSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Azenta, Inc.
(AZTA) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -0. 2% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Azenta, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to -5. 6% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AZTA leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AZTA or CCSI?
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -9. 4% for Azenta, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -1. 9% for AZTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AZTA or CCSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for Azenta, Inc. — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AZTA: 140. 5% to $44. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AZTA or CCSI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AZTA or CCSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCSI: -20. 6%, AZTA: +123. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AZTA and CCSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AZTA (Healthcare) and CCSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AZTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.