Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4.51B | $2.23B | $16.24B | $4.57B | $9.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65B | $695M | $3.53B | $2.18B | $4.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $317M | $59M | $508M | $150M | $-26M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 30.2% | 44.4% | 35.2% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 14.5% | 20.8% | 12.6% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 32.1x | 25.7x | 22.6x | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $61M | $328M | $1.82B | $280M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $705K | $35M | $580M | $100M | $366M |
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZZ Inc. (AZZ) | 100 | 439.7 | +339.7% |
| The Gorman-Rupp Com… (GRC) | 100 | 272.2 | +172.2% |
| IDEX Corporation (IEX) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 426.3 | +326.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AZZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.47 vs IEX's 4.81
- Lower P/E (22.1x vs 29.7x)
- 19.2% margin vs GTLS's -0.6%
- 14.4% ROA vs GTLS's -0.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4%
GRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +132.3% vs FELE's +21.2%
IEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 45.2%, current ratio 2.86x
- Beta 0.84, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.86x
Among these 5 stocks, FELE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs GRC's 237.5%
- Beta 0.22 vs GRC's 1.27
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.1x vs 29.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.2% margin vs GTLS's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs GRC's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.3% vs FELE's +21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs GTLS's -0.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4% |
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AZZ leads in 3 of 6 categories
GRC leads 0 • IEX leads 0 • FELE leads 0 • GTLS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AZZ and IEX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 6.0x GRC's $695M. AZZ is the more profitable business, keeping 19.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's -0.6%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $695M | $3.5B | $2.2B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $355M | $121M | $945M | $322M | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $317M | $59M | $508M | $150M | -$26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $325M | $101M | $611M | $169M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +30.2% | +44.4% | +35.2% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +14.5% | +20.8% | +12.6% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +8.4% | +14.4% | +6.9% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +14.5% | +17.3% | +7.8% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +9.9% | -11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.9% | +47.8% | +27.8% | +13.4% | -139.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AZZ leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, AZZ trades at a 98% valuation discount to GTLS's 626.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AZZ offers better value at 0.30x vs IEX's 6.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.2B | $16.2B | $4.6B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $2.5B | $17.5B | $4.8B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.37x | 41.88x | 34.09x | 31.87x | 626.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.07x | 32.12x | 25.71x | 22.56x | 29.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.30x | 2.65x | 6.37x | 3.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.74x | 20.46x | 18.87x | 14.30x | 14.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 3.26x | 4.70x | 2.15x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.41x | 5.36x | 4.09x | 3.53x | 2.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | 25.05x | 26.34x | 23.63x | 48.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AZZ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AZZ delivers a 24.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GTLS. AZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AZZ scores 7/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.5% | +11.3% | +12.6% | +11.4% | -0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.4% | +6.8% | +7.3% | +7.6% | -0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +9.9% | +10.4% | +14.7% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | +12.4% | +11.6% | +18.1% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.79x | 0.45x | 0.21x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60M | $292M | $1.2B | $181M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $705,000 | $35M | $580M | $100M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61M | $328M | $1.8B | $280M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.94x | 5.83x | 11.33x | 24.75x | 0.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AZZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AZZ five years ago would be worth $28,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,479 for IEX. Over the past 12 months, GRC leads with a +132.3% total return vs FELE's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AZZ at 56.1% vs FELE's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.9% | +76.5% | +22.8% | +7.3% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.2% | +132.3% | +21.3% | +21.2% | +39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +280.1% | +221.2% | +9.5% | +8.3% | +46.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.4% | +147.5% | +4.8% | +35.3% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.5% | +237.5% | +180.7% | +248.5% | +698.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.1% | +47.5% | +3.1% | +2.7% | +13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRC and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRC's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FELE's 92.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.27x | 0.84x | 0.84x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $154.13 | $84.99 | $223.94 | $111.53 | $208.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.67 | $34.96 | $157.25 | $84.31 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +99.5% | +97.6% | +92.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 67.7 | 56.3 | 57.2 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 196K | 151K | 579K | 254K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IEX and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AZZ as "Buy", GRC as "Hold", IEX as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for IEX (target: $245) vs -6.2% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, IEX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.29% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.50 | — | $244.71 | $100.00 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 3 | 29 | 11 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.9% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 16 | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.75 | $2.82 | $1.11 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.1% | +1.5% | +3.6% | 0.0% |
AZZ leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IDEX Corporation (IEX) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). AZZ Inc. (AZZ) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AZZ Inc. (AZZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
On trailing P/E, AZZ Inc.
(AZZ) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 626. 5x. On forward P/E, AZZ Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AZZ Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, AZZ Inc.
(AZZ) delivered a total return of +189. 4%, compared to +4. 8% for IDEX Corporation (IEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +698. 8% versus AZZ's +166. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 27β — meaning GRC is approximately 476% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IDEX Corporation (IEX) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AZZ Inc. grew EPS 486. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
AZZ Inc.
(AZZ) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IEX leads at 20. 8% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IEX leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) trades at 22. 1x forward P/E versus 32. 1x for The Gorman-Rupp Company — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IEX: 12. 0% to $244. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
IDEX Corporation (IEX) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), +698. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +698. 8%, GRC: +237. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AZZ and GRC and IEX and FELE and GTLS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AZZ, GRC, IEX, FELE pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.