Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Banks - Diversified
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $4.51B | $2.23B | $16.24B | $4.57B | $9.90B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65B | $695M | $3.53B | $2.18B | $4.15B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $317M | $59M | $508M | $150M | $-26M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 30.2% | 44.4% | 35.2% | 31.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 14.5% | 20.8% | 12.6% | 6.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 32.1x | 25.7x | 22.6x | 29.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $61M | $328M | $1.82B | $280M | $3.74B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $705K | $35M | $580M | $100M | $366M | $343.34B |
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZZ Inc. (AZZ) | 100 | 439.7 | +339.7% |
| The Gorman-Rupp Com… (GRC) | 100 | 272.2 | +172.2% |
| IDEX Corporation (IEX) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 426.3 | +326.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AZZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 486.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- PEG 0.47 vs IEX's 4.81
- 14.4% ROA vs GTLS's -0.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4%
GRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +132.3% vs FELE's +21.2%
IEX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 45.2%, current ratio 2.86x
- Beta 0.84, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.86x
- 5.8% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Beta 0.22 vs GRC's 1.27
JPM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 29.7x)
- 20.4% margin vs GTLS's -0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 29.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs GTLS's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs GRC's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.3% vs FELE's +21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs GTLS's -0.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4% |
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AZZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • GRC leads 0 • IEX leads 0 • FELE leads 0 • GTLS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 403.3x GRC's $695M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's -0.6%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $695M | $3.5B | $2.2B | $4.1B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $355M | $121M | $945M | $322M | $478M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $317M | $59M | $508M | $150M | -$26M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $325M | $101M | $611M | $169M | $10M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +30.2% | +44.4% | +35.2% | +31.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +14.5% | +20.8% | +12.6% | +6.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +8.4% | +14.4% | +6.9% | -0.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +14.5% | +17.3% | +7.8% | +0.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +9.9% | -11.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.9% | +47.8% | +27.8% | +13.4% | -139.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AZZ and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, AZZ trades at a 98% valuation discount to GTLS's 626.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AZZ offers better value at 0.30x vs IEX's 6.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.2B | $16.2B | $4.6B | $9.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $2.5B | $17.5B | $4.8B | $13.3B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.37x | 41.88x | 34.09x | 31.87x | 626.45x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.07x | 32.12x | 25.71x | 22.56x | 29.69x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.30x | 2.65x | 6.37x | 3.66x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.74x | 20.46x | 18.87x | 14.30x | 14.29x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 3.26x | 4.70x | 2.15x | 2.32x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.41x | 5.36x | 4.09x | 3.53x | 2.78x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | 25.05x | 26.34x | 23.63x | 48.80x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AZZ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AZZ delivers a 24.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GTLS. AZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AZZ scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.5% | +11.3% | +12.6% | +11.4% | -0.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.4% | +6.8% | +7.3% | +7.6% | -0.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +9.9% | +10.4% | +14.7% | +7.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | +12.4% | +11.6% | +18.1% | +8.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.79x | 0.45x | 0.21x | 1.11x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60M | $292M | $1.2B | $181M | $3.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $705,000 | $35M | $580M | $100M | $366M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61M | $328M | $1.8B | $280M | $3.7B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.94x | 5.83x | 11.33x | 24.75x | 0.79x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AZZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AZZ five years ago would be worth $28,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,479 for IEX. Over the past 12 months, GRC leads with a +132.3% total return vs FELE's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AZZ at 56.1% vs FELE's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.9% | +76.5% | +22.8% | +7.3% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.2% | +132.3% | +21.3% | +21.2% | +39.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +280.1% | +221.2% | +9.5% | +8.3% | +46.1% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.4% | +147.5% | +4.8% | +35.3% | +43.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.5% | +237.5% | +180.7% | +248.5% | +698.8% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.1% | +47.5% | +3.1% | +2.7% | +13.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRC and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRC's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FELE's 92.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.27x | 0.84x | 0.84x | 0.22x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $154.13 | $84.99 | $223.94 | $111.53 | $208.76 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.67 | $34.96 | $157.25 | $84.31 | $140.50 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +99.5% | +97.6% | +92.9% | +99.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 67.7 | 56.3 | 57.2 | 38.3 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 196K | 151K | 579K | 254K | 1.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AZZ as "Buy", GRC as "Hold", IEX as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for IEX (target: $245) vs -6.2% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.50 | — | $244.71 | $100.00 | $193.81 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 3 | 29 | 11 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.9% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 16 | 32 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.75 | $2.82 | $1.11 | $0.60 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.1% | +1.5% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
AZZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
AZZ vs GRC vs IEX vs FELE vs GTLS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IDEX Corporation (IEX) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). AZZ Inc. (AZZ) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AZZ Inc. (AZZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, AZZ Inc.
(AZZ) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 626. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AZZ Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, AZZ Inc.
(AZZ) delivered a total return of +189. 4%, compared to +4. 8% for IDEX Corporation (IEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +698. 8% versus AZZ's +166. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 27β — meaning GRC is approximately 476% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IDEX Corporation (IEX) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AZZ Inc. grew EPS 486. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 32. 1x for The Gorman-Rupp Company — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IEX: 12. 0% to $244. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is AZZ or GRC or IEX or FELE or GTLS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), +698. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +698. 8%, GRC: +237. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AZZ and GRC and IEX and FELE and GTLS and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AZZ (Industrials) and GRC (Industrials) and IEX (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. AZZ, GRC, IEX, FELE, JPM pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.