Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $77K | $10.02B | $2.32B | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23K | $5.27B | $3.37B | $3.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $363M | $-1.11B | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | -18.4% | 15.2% | 56.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -398.1% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.7x | 16.7x | 37.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.15B | $2.65B | $4.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $504K | $504M | $133M | $240M |
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| The Ensign Group, I… (ENSG) | 100 | 392.2 | +292.2% |
| Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC) | 100 | 88.0 | -12.0% |
| Surgery Partners, I… (SGRY) | 100 | 107.7 | +7.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BACK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ENSG's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ENSG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 14.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs SGRY's 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, current ratio 1.42x
ACHC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 22.7x)
SGRY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 22.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs BACK's -426.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs SGRY's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ENSG's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.0% vs SGRY's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs BACK's -31.3% |
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENSG leads in 3 of 6 categories
SGRY leads 1 • BACK leads 0 • ACHC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 232099.5x BACK's $22,723. ENSG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BACK's -426.9%. On growth, ENSG holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22,723 | $5.3B | $3.4B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $558M | $588M | $572M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $363M | -$1.1B | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $406M | -$215M | $208M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +15.2% | +56.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -398.1% | +8.5% | +11.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -426.9% | +6.9% | -32.8% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -215.1% | +7.7% | -6.4% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.3% | +18.4% | +7.6% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +21.9% | -49.8% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SGRY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACHC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENSG's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77,135 | $10.0B | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$427,054 | $13.7B | $4.8B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 29.36x | -2.07x | -23.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.68x | 16.75x | 37.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.13x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.40x | 8.38x | 10.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 1.98x | 0.70x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.52x | 1.07x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.02x | — | 9.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENSG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENSG delivers a 16.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-41 for ACHC. SGRY carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENSG's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENSG scores 5/9 vs BACK's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +16.6% | -40.9% | -2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +6.8% | -18.6% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.0% | +5.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +10.2% | +7.5% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.86x | 1.24x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$504,189 | $3.7B | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $504,189 | $504M | $133M | $240M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.2B | $2.7B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.20x | 88.33x | -5.99x | 1.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENSG five years ago would be worth $20,558 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for BACK. Over the past 12 months, ENSG leads with a +26.0% total return vs SGRY's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENSG at 23.0% vs BACK's -80.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.8% | -1.4% | +76.2% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | +26.0% | +4.0% | -36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +85.9% | -63.5% | -58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +105.6% | -60.3% | -71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +738.2% | -57.2% | +0.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.3% | +23.0% | -28.5% | -25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BACK and ACHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BACK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGRY's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACHC currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs BACK's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 0.38x | 0.82x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.21 | $218.00 | $30.20 | $24.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.03 | $134.68 | $11.43 | $11.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.1% | +78.6% | +83.4% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 22.0 | 42.7 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 364K | 3.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BACK and ENSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENSG as "Buy", ACHC as "Buy", SGRY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for SGRY (target: $19) vs 1.6% for ACHC (target: $26). For income investors, BACK offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs ENSG's 0.14%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $222.33 | $25.59 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 25 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.24 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
ENSG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SGRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BACK vs ENSG vs ACHC vs SGRY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (22. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
On forward P/E, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
Over the past 5 years, The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) delivered a total return of +105. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENSG returned +738. 2% versus BACK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Surgery Partners, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SGRY is approximately -2570% more volatile than BACK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Surgery Partners, Inc. (SGRY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 186% for The Ensign Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Surgery Partners, Inc. grew EPS 54. 1% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENSG leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 8% net margin versus -125. 5% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGRY leads at 11. 8% versus -78. 0% for BACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGRY leads at 23. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for Surgery Partners, Inc. — 20. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGRY: 31. 7% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY?
In this comparison, BACK (100.
0% yield), ENSG (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ACHC, SGRY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BACK or ENSG or ACHC or SGRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BACK: -100. 0%, SGRY: +0. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BACK and ENSG and ACHC and SGRY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ENSG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BACK pays a dividend while ENSG, ACHC, SGRY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.