Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $638M | $3.35B | $23.04B | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73.77B | $3.28B | $22.48B | $10.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.24B | $158M | $-774M | $-1.64B |
| Gross Margin | 4.4% | 31.7% | -19.3% | 1.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | 9.3% | -0.9% | -15.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.0x | 9.9x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $73.72B | $1.92B | $15.96B | $6.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $511M | $3.45B | $2.72B |
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braskem S.A. (BAK) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth -147.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.8%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
AVNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 4.8% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
- 2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 3.9% vs -9.0%
LYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 26.1x)
- Beta 0.38 vs BAK's 1.95
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 142.4% 10Y total return vs LYB's 48.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs WLK's -14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs BAK's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AVNT's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.2% vs BAK's +3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 3.9% vs -9.0% |
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVNT leads in 2 of 6 categories
LYB leads 1 • BAK leads 0 • WLK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAK is the larger business by revenue, generating $73.8B annually — 22.5x AVNT's $3.3B. AVNT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, AVNT holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73.8B | $3.3B | $22.5B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $445M | $865M | -$462M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.2B | $158M | -$774M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.1B | $205M | $3.1B | -$508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +31.7% | -19.3% | +1.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +9.3% | -0.9% | -15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +4.8% | -3.4% | -14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +6.3% | +13.6% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.7% | +2.5% | -100.0% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.6% | +3.8% | -100.0% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVNT and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AVNT's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $638M | $3.3B | $23.0B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $4.8B | $35.5B | $16.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.65x | 41.01x | -30.43x | -8.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.95x | 9.92x | 26.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.99x | 12.22x | 33.44x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 1.03x | 0.76x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.40x | 2.26x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.16x | 59.99x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVNT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVNT delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WLK. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVNT scores 5/9 vs WLK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.6% | -7.2% | -16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.6% | +2.6% | -3.0% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +3.9% | -1.1% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +4.0% | -1.1% | -8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.81x | 1.56x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58.7B | $1.4B | $12.5B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $511M | $3.4B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73.7B | $1.9B | $16.0B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 3.61x | -1.42x | -24.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AVNT and LYB and WLK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLK five years ago would be worth $10,229 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,845 for BAK. Over the past 12 months, LYB leads with a +37.2% total return vs BAK's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVNT at 0.8% vs BAK's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | +16.0% | +62.6% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | +4.1% | +37.2% | +27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | +2.3% | -5.5% | -12.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.5% | -22.7% | -11.3% | +2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +27.8% | +48.6% | +142.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | +0.8% | -1.9% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAK's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYB currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs BAK's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.19x | 0.38x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.29 | $44.85 | $83.94 | $124.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.32 | $27.48 | $41.58 | $56.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +81.4% | +85.2% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 55.2 | 50.9 | 32.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 620K | 8.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AVNT and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAK as "Buy", AVNT as "Buy", LYB as "Hold", WLK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs -59.5% for BAK (target: $2). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs WLK's 2.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.50 | $48.40 | $73.60 | $101.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 20 | 39 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.9% | +7.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $1.08 | $5.48 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% | +0.5% |
AVNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LYB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
BAK vs AVNT vs LYB vs WLK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braskem S.
A. (BAK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Avient Corporation (AVNT) offers the better valuation at 41. 0x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braskem S. A. (BAK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
On forward P/E, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
Over the past 5 years, Westlake Corporation (WLK) delivered a total return of +2.
3%, compared to -61. 5% for Braskem S. A. (BAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +142. 4% versus BAK's +1. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Braskem S. A. 's 1. 95β — meaning BAK is approximately 410% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braskem S.
A. (BAK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avient Corporation grew EPS -51. 6% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVNT leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
5% net margin versus -14. 6% for Braskem S. A. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVNT leads at 6. 2% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVNT leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Westlake Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 32. 6% to $48. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK?
In this comparison, LYB (7.
7% yield), AVNT (2. 9% yield), WLK (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BAK or AVNT or LYB or WLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 7% yield). Braskem S. A. (BAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +48. 6%, BAK: +1. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAK and AVNT and LYB and WLK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AVNT, LYB, WLK pay a dividend while BAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.