Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BAM vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BAM vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $81.63B | $97.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.98B | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.60B | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 69.4% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.3x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $219M | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $2.63B |
BAM vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Asset Ma… (BAM) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAM vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 0.88x
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.50 vs BX's 1.53, lower leverage
BX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.2%
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- 487.1% 10Y total return vs BAM's 67.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAM's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.9x vs 26.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.50 vs BX's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BAM's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.2% vs BAM's -8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BX's 0.3% |
BAM vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BAM vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.8B annually — 3.5x BAM's $4.0B. BAM is the more profitable business, keeping 54.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BX's 21.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +54.5% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.8% | +41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.1x trailing earnings, BX trades at a 15% valuation discount to BAM's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BX's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAM's 29.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81.6B | $97.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81.8B | $108.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.00x | 32.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.31x | 20.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 15.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.51x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.90x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 130.19x | 55.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $14 for BX. BAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BX's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BX scores 5/9 vs BAM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +71.0% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +103.0% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $207M | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $219M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.00x | 14.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAM five years ago would be worth $16,777 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for BX. Over the past 12 months, BX leads with a -3.2% total return vs BAM's -8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BX at 19.1% vs BAM's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.3% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | +487.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BX's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAM currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs BX's 65.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.10 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.20 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 7.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BAM as "Buy" and BX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.1% upside for BAM (target: $62) vs 25.3% for BX (target: $156). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.18% vs BAM's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.83 | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +6.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.3% |
BAM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BX leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
BAM vs BX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAM or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM). Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the better valuation at 32. 1x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAM or BX?
On trailing P/E, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the cheapest at 32. 1x versus Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Blackstone Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAM or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) delivered a total return of +67. 8%, compared to +64. 8% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +487. 1% versus BAM's +67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAM or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning BX is approximately 2% more volatile than BAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 61% for Blackstone Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAM or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -2. 0% for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to 7. 2% for Blackstone Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAM or BX?
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) is the more profitable company, earning 54. 5% net margin versus 21. 8% for Blackstone Inc. — meaning it keeps 54. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAM leads at 69. 4% versus 51. 9% for BX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAM or BX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAM: 27. 1% to $61. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAM or BX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM).
09Is BAM or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 2% yield, +487. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BX: +487. 1%, BAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAM and BX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.